In my experience Alma, milgraine is best done with a groove engraved
on either side of the proposed milgraine line. Milgraine is not
normally applied in the groove, it is applied to the ridge formed
by two parallel and slightly angled “V” shaped grooves. Ideally the
ridge shape should be almost rectangular in cross-section, with the
sides being perpendicular to the top of the ridge; i. e. the surface
to be milgrained.
It can be done on a flat surface or 90 degree edge without grooves,
but the outside edge of the tool will create marks on the outside of
the milgraine that can be as deep or deeper than the milgraine. Some
people like these tool marks just fine, others find them quite
objectionable. In any case, they are almost impossible to remove
without removing or heavily damaging the milgraine in the process.
The grooves are best cut with a square (often referred to as a
lozenge) graver with highly polished cutting surfaces, held in a
manner that creates a “V”, angled away from the ridge on a flat
surface, or cut vertically on the edges of an angle, like on the
edges of a flat band.
A ridge with vertical sides is the objective, regardless of the
shape of the piece. The sharper and more even the grooves are and the
more defined the resulting ridge is, the better the milgraine looks
when finished.
While the depth of the groove is only important in that it should be
at least deep enough to allow the edges of the wheel to remain clear
of the bottom of the groove, the width of the ridge is very
important. It should be ever-so-slightly narrower than the milgraine
wheel. Too wide and you’ll get tool marks on either side of the
ridge, making it look sort of like a row of ice cream scoops instead
of a row of perfect hemispheres. Too narrow and the ridge will likely
collapse under the pressure of the wheel. The result of either is
kind of muddy, rough and unrefined looking.
The larger the beads (the higher the number of the tool) the wider
the ridge needs to be. Consequently, the higher number tools are
easier to work with. Anything smaller than a number 10 can be tricky.
I use a number 12 milgraine wheel for most of my work but I sometimes
use a 14 around the inside edges of ring shanks, the part that
touches the finger. I haven’t a clue what the numbers mean or how
they were derived.
When used as a decorative edge around bead set or pave set stones,
one side of the ridge is formed by the bright cut, the other is cut
with a square graver, leaving the ridge on the very edge of the
setting. After applying the milgraine I like to go over the grooves
with a square graver to remove any tool marks left by the outside
edge of the wheel. This cleans it up and really makes it pop in
contrast with the high-polish of the grooves. In the engraving world,
this is considered the “proper” method of applying and finishing
milgraine.
If the shape of the piece is such that you can get to all of it, you
can use a fine sawblade to cut the groove, say an 8/0 and then use a
knife edge rubber wheel to clean and polish it. You can also use a
knife edge file, but I find such a file incapable of creating the
sharp, clean grooves and the resulting sharp-edged ridge required for
top-notch milgraine.
In the end, nothing beats a sharp and polished square graver when it
comes to cutting grooves for milgraine. No power tools are really
necessary, either for cutting the grooves or rolling the wheel. It’s
been done quite successfully for many years with nothing more than
simple hand gravers and wooden mushroom handles with collets to hold
the milgraine tool.
I always shorten the tool by an inch or so to approximately the same
length as my graver. The full length tool as received from the mfr is
just too hard for me to control and I slip all over the place,
chewing up the ridge and leaving marks everywhere. What a mess that
makes!
Another thing that can make a mess of otherwise first-rate milgraine
is to go over it multiple times. The size and spacing of the
depressions in most milgraine tools are not absolutely identical, so
the spacing from hole to hole can be very slightly uneven. When
rolling over milgraine a second or third time, the depressions will
often not hit the beads with exactly the same spacing, and split
beads will often be the result. This makes it really muddy looking
too and is almost impossible to fix unless you catch it early.
Be very careful whenever you remove the tool from the ridge to
reposition the work or whatever, that you start again at precisely
the same place you stopped (the very last bead) and don’t roll it
back over where you just were. You can roll over it multiple times as
long as you don’t lift the tool from the work, ensuring that each
bead is further rounded and refined by the exact same hole that
formed it the first time. I’ll sometimes use a Sharpie to mark where
the last bead is so I don’t roll back too far while doing the next
portion.
There are also milgraine tools that are intended for use inside of a
groove. Instead of hollow cups around the edge of a tiny wheel, they
have much larger wheels with raised dimples on the circumference that
form round or oval depressions in the groove. This isn’t really
milgraine though and works best in straight lines. It doesn’t work
well in conjunction with stone setting. The tools are also quite
expensive and are intended to be used with other holding tools and
are designed to apply the pattern on bands or plain shanks. Although
the use of this type of “milgraine” is fairly limited by it’s very
nature, it has it’s uses, and in the proper application can be quite
striking.
Hope this helps!
Dave Phelps