When we've all grown up and have quit expecting other people to
pull us along and make us quote "famous" unquote. When we can all
be genuine creators, not artists, expecting some person with
"clout" to pull our name above the fray, then maybe we can say we
made a difference"
I’m with some of the other writers and professional jewelers that
are wondering why this thread is still going on… I, am actually
pissed at myself for contributing further, BUT… (you knew that was
coming!) I am a grown up professional metalsmith and an artist- I
make art jewelry.
I’m fairly certain there is no “we can all be” anything, nor do most
professionals aspire to making any difference - whatever that means-
through a product they create for a living and sell…the above quote
really gave me… pause… It seems far beyond naieve, and far into a
sheep mentality- jewelry artists are not sheep, there is no flock,
nor herder and I expect no one wants to be herded…and when anyone
gives away a piece they have a reason for it- but as a marketing
tool it is ridiculous, unless attached to a viable campaign say, to
get potential customers into a store or gallery or to attend a
charity event at which X’s work is featured as a valuable collectors
item, or wearable art… advertising nonetheless, at the root of the
“free” giveaway…
I don’t know what most on Orchid work in but I personally use high
karat golds, and mixed metals- all precious, or reactive at the
cheapest end of costs, then there are all the other elements that
cost me in making the piece- from wax to water, electricity to
property taxes…If I wanted to target a celebrity - well, there’s
the point- I would no more target a celebrity than the Royal Jeweller
to HRM Queen Elizabeth. It seems that if one creates their own solid
form and style and perfects his or her techniques, then develops a
marketing strategy to target the market one envisions those works
worn on or collected by (and reflected in the retail price, product
placement, and vendors that distribute your line(s))- the work will
be self-supporting and sought out by a far wider range than just, in
the example put before us, a politician’s wife inserted into every
photo - op in print at present that happens to have a sense of style
and probably a bevy of stylists or at least assistants (remember
Michelle Obama made 112 Million last year on her own) doing some
buying for her… the heart ", making any difference on some level
(I can’t figure out what that meant) has nothing to do with business
on a large scale that I can see from a perspective of being in the
jewelry business - of which art jewelry is a niche crafts business
within the larger picture- for many years…
professional work doesn’t need to be spun so-to-speak, Art jewelry’s
merits promote sales and the sales reinforce the quality of the
workmanship and the artists intention which in this business is to
live beyond marginally in pursuit of one’s artistic vision or one’s
ability to run a CAD/CAM application.
The whole statement about not being an artist has me stunned,
frankly. How can anyone not be an artist but “creating” jewelry- I
personally find that nonsensical.
Kevin, I don;t think it’s a gender specific statement (in fact in
defense of women metalsmiths and jewelrs that was a bit snarky of you
to imply imo), but an idiosyncratic statement by someone perhaps not
making a living as a jeweler…and not making the connection between
brain and muscle and jewelry and art… I for one will certainly not
be sending off anything to a politician millionaire- remember the
artist working from the heart a few years ago that got busted and
jailed in the federal Penn for making a “dream catcher” with an eagle
feather attached and sending it to Mrs. Clinton?
There is a fine line between sentimentality and connection to ones
artistic creations, and the ultimate destiny of each piece and who
will own it…Pricing is perhaps a contributing factor and ensures
that an open, but specific group will have access to one’s
creations… rer