The guy offert them two silver rings wihtout stones for 1700, and
they did it !!! Just two simple round rings with a letter of their
name on top of it. A zircon was not within their capacity to pay
for.
Pedro, is that 1700 dollars, U.S. Or some other currency? If
Dollars, then I’d not call that a jeweler asking for his just and
fair pay anymore. I’d call it fraud and theft. It’s one thing to say
you can set your own prices, and if you feel you are or your work is,
worth a certain amount, you can fairly ask that amount. But it seems
to me that as a professional, a jeweler does also have an obligation
to the customer, as well as to the trade and it’s public reputation,
to deal fairly with a customer and give fair value for the price
paid. Unless there is something very much more to thise rings than
you descirbe, I cannot see that as having been the case.
Who is the fool now, the jeweller asking so much or the two people
willing to pay for this kind of deal?
I’d say the customers are the naive ones, perhaps the fools. But
they have an expectation that the jeweler is a professional, and will
treat them fairly. When this isn’t the case, perhaps they are fools,
yes. But the jeweler is a thief if he/she takes blatant advantage of
a customer’s ignorance without making them fully aware of just what
they are getting for their money, and perhaps letting them know they
are paying a very high price…
If I were to walk into a toyota dealership and ask to buy a Prius,
and was told that the price, today, just for me, would be 250
thousand dollars, and I were to then say OK and buy that car, only
later to find the dealer down the streat sold them for a tenth of
that, I think I’d have a fair case to take to court for fraud, and I
suspect your two customers with their silver rings have the same.
That is, if your price was in U.S. dollars. Now, if it’s another
currency that converts to two hundred dollars, well, then it’s high,
but within the realm of possibility again…
Peter Rowe