Trying to learn silver soldering on my own

I spoke to a lady who is getting exacting setting from a
jeweller who is self-taught. He is giving her critical and important
that is again “self-taught”. I explained to her I
wouldn’t go to a heart or brain surgeon who is self-taught. So why is
she doing this route?

I know I’m gonna get reams of negative responses, but why would
anyone go to get that from someone who is
self-taught?..as in a total…Duh?

It took me 9 years of my life to learn first-hand from a mentor,
instructor, diamond setter who himself spent 1/4 of his life
learning his craft. Neither one of us are “self-taught”.

If you don’t know the basics or intermediate routes in diamond-stone
setting, how in blazes can you further yourself in this craft…You
just don’t know the right tools to buy/purchase let alone how to use
them correctly…“oh, here are a bunch of old setting burs, now set me
a Princess diamond worth $20,000”. I’d go to a person male of female
who has at least some form of training from a school or a “in-shop
mentoring program”…

A friend of mine out-of-province had a Princess diamond to set, he
was “self-taught” again, he chipped off three corners out of four.
He lost a good client, and had to repolish the stone and it lost. 10
points, plus the polishing fees, and the $$ in weight loss.

Another scenario, I needed root-canal work on an ailing tooth last
week. My dentist is not self-taught, he alone spent hundreds, or
thousands of days just learing the correct methods for this exacting
dental process. Need I say more?..

Gerry Lewy!

I think comparing teaching yourself soldering with teaching yourself
diamond setting is not the best comparison. Soldering is FAR simpler
to learn, and you’re not risking someone’s $20,000 diamond.

In any case, some of us self-taught jewellers aren’t doing too badly
at all, thank you very much. Some of us have no choice but to teach
ourselves - with the help of Orchid of course. In theory, you can
teach yourself absolutely anything. You could (in theory) teach
yourself how to be a doctor - but fortunately that’s not legal - but
it could be done. You don’t always have to have someone show you how
to do something to be able to accomplish a particular task. Books
are a wonderful invention and it depends on your mindset. If I am
determined to learn something, I will learn it. If I want to try a
new technique and make a piece of jewellery using that technique,
then I will do exactly that. “What if it doesn’t work” is not an
option in my book. You do what you need to do until it works, and
you learn from that. Of course, you are doing so at your own expense
if things go wrong during the process, but the beauty of much of what
we do, is that we can melt it down or send it in for refining and try
again. Not so with stones of course.

In the two and a half years since I started teaching myself to make
jewellery, I’ve come a long way. It’s been a very steep learning
curve - which is how I like it. I can’t say how things would have
been if I’d been fortunate enough to take classes. Maybe I’d have
progressed even further and faster - or maybe I’d have been limited
by the pace of the class. I’m a very fast learner, and I want to move
on quickly, building on the skills I’ve just learned, so I can get
very frustrated in a class.

As has been said many times, there is room for us all - even us
self- taught jewellers. Folks who have paid their dues, and sweated
for decades at the bench don’t seem to like the thought that any Tom,
Dick or Harry can come along and teach themselves what they have
taken decades to learn. Well sorry, but they can. But it will take us
decades too, but we are capable of being just as good as you are -
some day. Official qualifications are one thing, but being qualified
by experience is also a recognised route in many fields. You just
need to learn where your limits lie, for your particular level of
experience. I’ve just been asked to quote for seven wedding rings -
three of which are to be stone-set. Depending on what my clients are
after, I may have to turn some of them down, if my experience is not
up to that standard yet. Stone setting is the one area where I would
definitely take classes if I were able to. I’d have to find the
right classes though, with the right teacher, as I wouldn’t want to
end up in a class which took a whole term to teach basic bezel
setting, for example - something I’ve taken two and a half years (on
and off) to master to the point where my bezels are now very neat,
well-fitting and professional-looking (my website shows a range from
early, poor bezel settings, to more recent ones). I would want to
learn all the other types of settings, channel, pave, gypsy, prong,
etc - learning the proper way, from a master in stone setting -
someone like you Gerry! But as I can’t afford it, I’ll battle on, on
my own and it’ll take me longer to achieve, but I’ll get there, and
I’ll get to the point where I’ll be confident with someone’s $20,000
diamond. Until that time, I’ll turn down such jobs. So now, to teach
myself gypsy setting, before embarking upon my first wedding ring
commission. Practice ring blanks and stones already bought and I
won’t start on the real thing until I’m 100% happy that the result is
of professional quality. I’ll be blogging about it soon, as the
wedding is on new year’s eve!!!

Sorry for rambling on, but your post did raise a few hackles.

Helen
UK
http://www.hillsgems.co.uk
http://helensgems.ganoksin.com/blogs/

here are a bunch of old setting burs, now set me a Princess diamond
worth $20,000 

Setting burs? For a princess?

Square peg, round hole.

If the friend followed that recipe, no wonder he chipped it. You’ve
got to relieve the inside corner.

I know I'm gonna get reams of negative responses, but why would
anyone go to get that from someone who is
self-taught?..as in a total..Duh? 

I work in a highly technical (and creative) environment. The
majority of my colleagues went to college / university / artschools /
specialized courses and yet, I’m entirely self-taught. I’m often on
the forefront developing new techniques and have worked on several
award-winning projects. I believe that one of the reasons that I
have that ability, is that I always had to learn new ways of doing
things. At the same time, the quality of my work is also such that
people never question my education (or lack of).

While people who have gone through schools/apprenticeships will
usually have better craftsmanship than those who haven’t, it does
not mean that you cannot achieve the same level of ability.

In any case, some of us self-taught jewellers aren't doing too
badly at all, thank you very much. 

And good for you all - seriously. I think there’s a response (not
just Helen…) to a percieved-but-not-intended snobbery. It’s really
a matter of degree.

My mother was a ravenous reader and studied many things. My nephew
is a Phd physicist. One day my nephew told me about how my mother
had gotten into an argument with him about physics and he looked at
me like, “Can you believe that?!?!?” Some people don’t know what
they don’t know.

Many people get along just fine with what they know and do - Helen
for one is just as happy as a clam, it seems. And good for her and
the rest. But there is soldering and then there’s Soldering, there’s
setting and then there’s Setting. Most importantly, there’s design
and then there’s DESIGN - which is tied to skill and abilty and
experience. But to me it makes no difference as long as people
understand how high the mountain is. It’s when a newbie gets all
puffed up about having minor skills that I get abit riled myself. I
would dispute Helen’s assertion that one can teach themselves to be
a doctor (without arguing about it) - yes books are wonderful things.
Teachers and/or mentors are even more wonderful and there’s much
that can’t be put into words. But it’s all just philosophy, to me -
I’m not writing this to get into some dispute.

One job I had (more than once, actually) was that a Patek Phillipe
watch had one of it’s lugs pop off and get lost. Boring stuff, yes,
but I needed to make the lug and solder it in just the precise right
spot. Easy until you think about it being a $20,000 eggshell of 18kt
gold - $50,000 with the movement in place. There is soldering and
then there is Soldering. It’s not just more of the same knowlege,
it’s in another league… There is definately room for everyone, but
don’t argue with a Phd about their field, either - not saying anybody
is, it’s just unwise… You can’t read enough books to come near my
(and many other’s) experience, you can’t get the experience if people
don’t give you the work, and you won’t get the work without the
experience…The mountain is HIGH…

Hi Sarah,

Your 9 kt wire probably has zinc in it as one of the alloys. Enamel
and zinc don’t mix. Besides looking beautiful, one of the reasons
for using gold wire is that there is no firescale. If you want to
use gold you have to have it alloyed with silver only or use 24 K
gold.

However since the gold is so expensive, why not use fine silver wire
that is readily available at all of the metals places and you can
have the piece goldplated afterwards.

Donna Buchwald

I know I'm gonna get reams of negative responses, but why would
anyone go to get that from someone who is
self-taught?..as in a total..Duh? 

Who cares where and how the skills and were learned as long as they
work.

I’ve had classes, 3 years of art school, and worked as an
apprentice. Never once did someone stand behind me and guide my
hands. For sure there were suggestions, different possible techniques
mentioned, and rough critiques which probably saved time. In the end
I learned the skills myself. And what happens when you move out of
the realm of the teacher/mentors skill set?

I once worked in a shop where goldsmiths were expected to start with
a sketch, handful of gold and stones. I was very honest about my lack
of setting skills when hired. After about 3 weeks I got a job bag and
was told to make the ring and set a bunch of marquis stones… or
clean out my bench for the last time. Books helped, the other
goldsmiths in the shop were not about to help nor get involved in my
nightmare with the bosses. I survived and continued to work there for
years, over 1/2 of their stone work involved fancy shapes in fancy
settings.

jeffD
Demand Designs
Analog/Digital Modelling & Goldsmithing
http://www.gmavt.net/~jdemand

We all learn techniques, some better than others, whether technical
or not. It’s like playing golf…some can drive and some can play the
short game and some putt, but the pros put it all together.

No matter how good someone is there will always be someone better,
whether in stone setting, casting, polishing… there is an art to it
all. To find someone that can do it all is becoming more difficult to
find.

There is definately room for everyone, but don't argue with a Phd
about their field, either - not saying anybody is, it's just
unwise.. 

To an extent I agree, and yet - it is those who do argue, who don’t
accept the status quo, who often wind up defining new fields, new
learning, new techniques. If we only did what we had been taught,
then no one would know how to do open heart surgery - there had to
be a first person who tried that, who had NOT been taught by anyone.
Same is true for any new thing. Someone has to be first.

Sometimes, probably most of the time, that someone is a person with
extensive experience and training in the field. But that is
definitely not ALWAYS true.

Conversely, it is absolutely true that there are plenty of people
out there with extensive training in any given field who are only
marginally better than hacks, if that. There are doctors I have been
sent to that I would not send my dog to. They did the whole med
school intern thing - and are as ignorant as they can be. Same is
true in any field.

So yes, there is a LOT to be said for both training and experience;
but there are those who reach those high mountaintops by a
completely different road. They are few, to be sure - but they do
exist.

I would also point out that design is not tied to ability to execute
the design - but rather to ability to envision it. The execution is
a completely different thing. I have over 30 years of experience as a
professional artist, but considerably less than that in jewelry. I
can design WAY past what I can execute! If I’m lucky, maybe one day
the two will meet. But I sure learn a lot trying to find ways within
my skill level to accomplish anything close to what I envisioned!
Makes me more creative :wink:

Personally, I am less interested in how you got where you are, than
in where it is that you are, who it is that you are, and if that
means you can do whatever it is I want done in a way that will meet
my expectations and requirements.

I’m on the path to the mountaintop some of you reside on, but my
path is quite different than yours was. That does not mean I won’t
reach your mountaintop - but it doesn’t mean I will either! It just
means if I do, I will have arrived by a different route. And
truthfully, I am probably headed for an entirely different
mountaintop!

Beth Wicker
Three Cats and a Dog Design Studio

http://www.bethwicker.etsy.com
http://bethwicker.ganoksin.com/blogs/

I first of all want to start this off with an explanation: I refer to
John Donivan as Mr. Donivan out of the respect that I have acquired
for him and his presentation of self in this forum. I would really
like to shake your hand some day and “twist” your ear or be able to
“shadow” you for a period of time. I have the utmost respect for you,
your work, and the body of knowledge and advice that you share so
freely. I am sure it is appreciated by more than just me.

I am “self-teaching” myself a set of skills that I have been able to
build upon, and IMHO, I’ve made progress. I appreciated the line:

It's when a newbie gets all puffed up about having minor skills
that I get a bit riled myself.

I once thought I had created this wonderful item, only to discover
later, that in jewelry parlance, it was known as a jump ring. The
important thing is I discovered both the need for the item, and
figured out a way to “do-it” as an intuitive thing. Not always
efficient, but, problem solving skills are never found in an “over
abundance.”

I realize, acutely sometimes, “my short-comings” and lack of
knowledge, this is one of many areas where “newbies” are separated
from the Pro’s. We are not always aware of our limitations. I have
looked at pieces that friends asked if I could repair. More often
than not, I’ve backed down saying that my skills were not at that
point as of yet. I am honest in my opinion of my self, an area where
self-deprecation is an asset. Make sure your head fits the hat you
are wearing. I have embraced the line from one of the many recent
films about Bob Dylan where he says, to the effect, " You are in
trouble when you start to believe the applause."

I have also learned to follow my head, my heart already in the lead.
I have sat at the bench sometimes, looked down, and my attention was
caught by a shape or texture, and I off I went in pursuit. Often
times, the result is quite astonishing in a pleasant manner. This new
piece may be “out of character” or “not my style” but, it broadened
my skill set, AND, led me off on another tangent. I learned
something, incorporated it in my body of skills.

I am painfully aware that I am not a designer, an engineer, nor
physicist. Not to mention a poor chemist and metallurgist. I am
aware, that at my age many “dreams” are out of reach. That’s ok. One
can aspire, one can persist. My wisdom, for what is is worth and
have the salt shaker handy, to pass along to those on the path is: If
you did it once. Do it again. If you did it ten times, do it a
hundred. If you did a hundred, do it a thousand. "How do you get to
Carnage Hall? Practice, practice, practice. peace.

http://web.mac.com/saboiam/Peaceman/Welcome.html

PS: Should you dare look, I am horribly embarrassed at my early
copper fold-form" attempts. Skip them.

Hi John,

Helen for one is just as happy as a clam, it seems. 

No, I’m not John. There’s too much that I want to learn how to do,
that at the moment I just can’t do. I want to climb that big
mountain you mentioned, so I’m neither happy nor complacent.

But there is soldering and then there's Soldering, there's setting
and then there's Setting. Most importantly, there's design and then
there's DESIGN - which is tied to skill and abilty and experience. 

I’m aware of that, and if you’ll notice in my post, I did mention
about it being important that you know where your limits are with
regard to experience. Meaning not to take on jobs that are too
advanced for your skills, knowledge and experience. I know my limits
and work within them, but that does not mean that I NEED a teacher/
mentor to advance those limits. For sure I’d love a teacher, but
can’t afford one.

On the design front, there are folks who have a natural flair for
design right from the outset, and others who can be taught design
principles until they’re blue in the face, but will never design
anything which is aesthetically pleasing. You’ve either got it or
you haven’t, but time and experience will improve what you have, for
sure.

It's when a newbie gets all puffed up about having minor skills
that I get abit riled myself. 

That’s a little unfair. It’s a major thing when you’re new and
soldering suddenly works properly for the first time. Maybe even you
got a bit puffed up when it first worked for you? Nobody is saying
that once you accomplish something like that, that it suddenly makes
you a jeweller.

I would dispute Helen's assertion that one can teach themselves to
be a doctor 

I meant the theory of being a doctor, rather than the practical
stuff, but off course, like jewellery, it’s a practical subject.
However, with jewellery, the metal itself is a wonderful teacher if
you know how to listen to it. You can’t go practicing medicine on
people to learn how to be a doctor, and that was a bad example for me
to use, but you can practice and learn the craft of jewellery making
by working with metal. The metal responds in a certain way to
whatever input you give it - and if you’re savvy, you learn from
that.

There is soldering and then there is Soldering. It's not just more
of the same knowlege, it's in another league.... 

And that’s why I wouldn’t dream of attempting to solder on such an
expensive article unless I’d had at least a couple of decades
experience under my belt, and experience appropriate to enable me to
do that with confidence.

There is definately room for everyone, but don't argue with a Phd
about their field, either 

I’m definitely NOT doing that.

You can't read enough books to come near my (and many other's)
experience,. 

John, you completely misunderstood what I was trying to say. The
simple fact is, that you can’t read enough books to come near
ANYBODY’S experience - only EXPERIENCE will do that. And I’m talking
about reading books to learn the theory, and practicing by yourself
(if that’s the only route open to you) and taking the two or three
decades necessary to attain the same level of experience. It IS
entirely possible. I am constantly asked how on earth I manage to
make what I make, without anybody having taught me how to do it -
and I’m not puffed up by it, as to me it’s no great thing - but I can
honestly, hand on heart say that not a single person has ever shown
me how to do any of the things I’ve learned with regard to jewellery
making. Things that people have written on Orchid and things I’ve
read in books, and the metal itself have taught me what I know so
far, and will continue to teach me what I will know in the future
hopefully.

you can't get the experience if people don't give you the work, and
you won't get the work without the experience....The mountain is
HIGH... 

This is not proving to be the case. In my experience, whatever field
of expertise I’ve decided to go into, virtually as soon as you enter
that field, people somehow see you as an expert and look to you for
the answers to their problems. Many years ago, I started a college
course to learn biology and chemstry prior to my degree. As soon as
I started college, I had people asking me about minor health
problems, because they assumed that I must be learning all about the
human body and its workings! Later on, I was at college doing a
degree in garden design (note, garden DESIGN, not gardening), and
many people would ask me about plants they had, which had some sort
of disease or pest. Then, surprise, surprise, when folks heard that I
was learning to make jewellery, I was inundated (and I mean
inundated) by people asking me to fix this and that, or make this and
that. So, people will give you the work, but you just have to learn
not to take it if your experience is not yet up to the mark. Last
week, my own newly engaged niece asked me to resize her platinum
engagement ring, because she didn’t want to send it away to its maker
(a fellow Orchid member) to be resized. I had to turn her down
gently, not because I wasn’t capable of doing it, but because I’m not
insured if things had gone wrong, such as a tiny flaw in one of the
stones meaning that it couldn’t take the heat, and one of the stones
breaking, for example. I explained that the person who made it, knows
how it was made, exactly the materials it was made from, etc, and
that as a result they would be more able to do the job, and that
(worst case scenario) if a stone did break, they would be in a
position to pop a new one in. Someone with a laser would have been in
a better position to do the job were it not going back to its maker.

So folks will give you the work - you just have to learn to say no
if you’re not quite there yet, and explain why. They’ll still offer
you work and each case has to be judged on its own merits as to
whether it’s within your capabilities. The same niece has asked me to
quote for making the wedding rings, as she really wants them made by
me. I will quote for work I am capable of doing.

I agree wholeheartedly with Jeff D who said “Who cares where and how
the skills were learned as long as they work”. That’s the crux of it.
My whole point in replying to Jerry’s post, was misunderstood. I
never said that it is possible to get to his standards in a short
amount of time - just that it is possible to get there without being
physically taught by another person - and it IS. I even said that it
will take me decades to get there, but I’ve no doubt that I can get
there, because I am pig-headed and determined to learn.

I’m afraid I don’t do putting people on pedestals. For me there are
no jewellery gods or godesses. There are many people (including many
Orchid members) who are VERY, VERY good at what they do, and I will
give them the respect they deserve, but I don’t agree with anybody
being puffed up about the skill levels they’ve achieved. Any of us
are capable of reaching those levels, or climbing that mountain, if
we are determined enough, and we don’t necessarily have to have a
teacher to get us there - just time and experience. I DO believe that
it takes time and experience and will never contest that.

Some people need to be taught as they don’t feel confident enough to
go find the for themselves, or put it into practice, and
that is fine. But it’s not the ONLY way. There are people in
existence, who reach higher levels of achievement by teaching
themselves, than those who have been taught by others in a given
field. You could take classes for years and years, and still not be
as good as another person who taught themselves - it is entirely
possible, and poor teachers do exist, as do poor students. Folks who
have been shown by others to do what they do, should NOT feel
undermined by others who have got there by a different route. It
doesn’t undermine their own achievements or skills in any way. I
don’t get what the fuss is about. It’s simply a different route -
same time scale, different route.

Sorry for the lengthy post.

Helen
UK
http://www.hillsgems.co.uk
http://helensgems.ganoksin.com/blogs/

shop where goldsmiths were expected to start with a sketch, handful
of gold and stones. 

There’s no need to belabor the point, but a bit of clarification is
good, I think. First of, I forget that people might take my posts
personally because I use their quote. I don’t mean it personally,
just a representative quote. Orchid has lots of people who took a
jewelry class and then set out doing a solo thing. It seems to be a
significant business model in America these days. That’s fine and
dandy, as far as it goes. I’ve said it many times - the value of
working with other people and getting outside of yourself is not in
having someone tutor you directly, which rarely happens anyway. It is
that you will be confronted by things that you can’t think up
yourself, and be challenged by problems that you either wouldn’t
think of or might avoid for being too difficult. It’s human nature.

To use Helen’s example of studying medicine - idealistically speaking
anything is possible. Is it realistically possible that a person
could become a doctor in any reasonable time and have some life left
to practice medicine (and yes, it’s an imperfect example)? Perhaps -
I hate to close doors… The biggest issue I would see would be
knowing WHAT to study. How would you know the importance of all of
the more obscure but terribly important things that need to be known
without being shown the need? Plus there is the curriculum - first we
learn this, which leads us to that, which takes us naturally to
there…

I can share the idea of being self-taught a lot, too. There comes a
point where your head bangs against the ceiling, though. A single
individual simply cannot re-invent the entire jewelry industry on
their own, and it’s foolish to think so. I soldered a bit, and I
watched some people in the shop I worked at, and when they said,
“Let’s see what John can do with a torch” I just sat down and
soldered - easy. But that was just the beginning. I really don’t get
where the attitude (that’s not personal to anyone) that there’s some
virtue in working alone in the basement comes from to begin with.
The joy and pleasure of colllaborating with fellow craftspeople is
rich and full. The ability to contribute to work that is beyond your
own abilities because each facet is done by expert craftspeople - of
which you are one, is also a pleasure. An the learing that comes
from working with the best of the best from all over the world is
beyond compare.

There’s a lot more to making jewelry than sticking two pieces of
metal together…

I need to correct myself from a post I sent today. I said “I can
honestly, hand on heart say that not a single person has ever shown
me how to do any of the things I’ve learned with regard to jewellery
making”. I was wrong, as I momentarily forgot that a fellow Orchid
member Anna McDade showed me how to accomplish etching, using PCB
blue.

Anna joined Orchid recently, and lives locally, so we contacted each
other and arranged to meet up. She came to my house and I helped her
out with some soldering problems she was experiencing, and Anna
taught me how to etch - so sorry about that Anna! Incidentally, I
really enjoyed getting together, and am thinking of starting up a
group for locals where we can get together once a month and share
ideas, etc over a bite to eat and a drink. Just a thought at the
moment, but anyone in Lancashire, UK interested, let me know.

Helen
UK

First of, I forget that people might take my posts personally
because I use their quote - today it's Helen, it seems. 

People will take comments personally, if the point you are making
applies to them.

the value of working with other people and getting outside of
yourself is not in having someone tutor you directly, which rarely
happens anyway. 

I never said that the ideal was to work on your own. Far from it.
Just that if it’s the only route open to you, it’s possible to reach
the same standards, given enough time. I do feel that you are
choosing to miss my point entirely. In any case, the point of
Gerry’s post was to devalue the work of the self-taught and to say
that to be trusted in this business, one must be taught/mentored by
others. To me, that is just plain narrow-minded and a sweeping
generalisation. The whole situation is much more complex than that.

I really don't get where the attitude (that's not personal to
anyone) that there's some virtue in working alone in the basement
comes from to begin with. The joy and pleasure of colllaborating
with fellow craftspeople is rich and full. The ability to
contribute to work that is beyond your own abilities because each
facet is done by expert craftspeople - of which you are one, is
also a pleasure. 

Again, I never said that working on one’s own is what we self-taught
folks are striving for. You’ve no idea how much I hanker after
working in a shop with other bench jewellers, each feeding of the
others’ creativity. That’s my dream situation, but such an
opportunity is not open to all of us for various reasons. I’ve
actually been thinking of setting up a group for local metal
artists/ jewellers, where we could get together once a month to share
ideas, etc, and show our work, alternating between each others’ homes
or workshops, because I know the value of working and sharing with
others.

There's a lot more to making jewelry than sticking two pieces of
metal together.... 

Okay, I’ll bite, because I’ve clearly chosen to enter into this
debate. Saying that “There’s a lot more to making jewelry than
sticking two pieces of metal together”, is an assumption that us
self- taught jewellers and newbies assume that that’s all there is to
it. I would like to venture that we are not that naive.

As I said before, the situation is a lot more complex than that.
There are many different levels of what people want to achieve, and
there are many different things that the buying public want to buy.
It’s a fact that soldering a bezel onto a backplate for a cabochon
and stringing it with beads is far easier and more achievable than
making an advanced piece of fine jewellery and setting it with
diamonds and other valuable stones. However, the former type of
jewellery is where most of us start, and it’s also what many people
actually prefer to wear. There are many women who just don’t go in
for the whole gold/ platinum and diamond thing, preferring more
simple silver and bead jewellery instead. So taking a class which
enables you to make such jewellery and then making a career of that
is a perfectly viable business model if that’s what you want to do.
Equally, teaching yourself how to do that is doable too. However,
some of us want to progress past that, and reach the levels of John D
and Gerry Lewy, etc, etc, making and setting advanced pieces of fine
jewellery. The ideal would be as Gerry described it - to learn from a
teacher/mentor or two or three during one’s career. But my
circumstances (and those of a few others) won’t allow for that, and
so we must do the best we can.

Please remember that I am NOT saying it’s possible to climb that
mountain in a short space of time - it is NOT. The assumption that I
think that, is confusing two different issues - those of time and
teaching methods. I am merely saying, that it is possible to teach
oneself to get to that high level, and that it will take two or
three decades to get there and to have the relevant experience, just
as it did with those who were taught by others.

Please, please, please don’t misunderstand the point I am trying to
make. It’s extremely frustrating when you take a long time to write
a carefully worded post, and then people come along and make
assumptions, taking a few comments completely out of context, and
implying that you are saying a bunch of things that you are not.
I’ve tried to be as clear as I can so that it cannot be misconstrued,
but somebody sadly always does misconstrue what I and other people
say.

Also, this “it’s not possible to get to a high level by being self-
taught, and the work of such people cannot be trusted” type of
attitude is not a very healthy one on such a forum, and not very
encouraging to those who are new to all this. Again, the mountain is
just as high, but the route to the top is just different, albeit
possibly more difficult.

Helen
UK
http://www.hillsgems.co.uk
http://helensgems.ganoksin.com/blogs/

John’s post reminded of learning to fly helicopters. No one in their
right mind would try to learn how to fly one without an instructor,
but it wasn’t that long ago, it wasn’t that way. In the early days,
no one knew how to fly a helicopter, heck, they didn’t even know if
the damn things would fly at all. So the innovators had no option but
to teach themselves. Not only did they have to teach themselves how
to fly, they had to figure out what the machine was doing and figure
out if the problems they were experiencing were a design fault of the
aircraft, pilot error, or a previously unknown aerodynamic
phenomenon. Or a combination of all three. Talk about a high mountain
with steep sides!

Learning how to solder isn’t really any different than learning how
to fly. You can read about it, watch someone do it a hundred times,
but in the end, you have to sit down and do it yourself. There is no
other way. As John says, there just aren’t enough books out there to
get you to the top of the food chain. You can take classes, you can
build a library of books on the subject, but in the end, you have to
teach yourself if you ever want to get beyond the basics. There just
isn’t any form of instruction that can substitute for twenty years at
the bench.

Then there’s guys like Jim Binnion and Steven Kretchmer. There
weren’t any classes or books on what those guys have accomplished.
Just like the pioneers in aviation, they had no alternative but to
teach themselves. That’s how you know you’re at the top of your
field. You have to teach yourself. There’s no one out there that
can teach you the next level. There’s no one at the next level. No
one even knows there is a next level. Except you.

Dave Phelps

You can take classes, you can build a library of books on the
subject, but in the end, you have to teach yourself if you ever want
to get beyond the basics. There just isn't any form of instruction
that can substitute for twenty years at the bench. 

Precisely. I like the way you’re seeing it from both sides of the
fence Dave. You’re saying what I’ve tried to say, that it’s
experience which counts - years and years of experience. It doesn’t
matter whether you’re taught by someone else, or whether you’ve
learned via books, etc - as long as you put the years of labour into
it, then your work is capable of being as good as someone who had
lessons. Different routes to the same destination.

Helen
UK

I’ve been watching this thread with great interest. Since I teach
soldering and I sell soldering tools, my own experiences in learning
most anything is “self taught.” So what exactly is “self taught?”,
which seems to be more the issue.

Teaching a group of students tricks with soldering and understanding
heat control has been largely, for me, “self taught.” Perception and
expectation of a goal is what seems to be Gerry’s concern. Comparing
a brain surgeon and a stone setter is hardly fair. I’ve been around
lots of amazing people who didn’t know squat about jewelry, tinkered
with it and not only make stunning work, find innovative ways to
approach traditional techniques, but also make fabulous teachers. One
person that comes to mind is Michael Boyd.

I hold a BFA from a prestigious college. Did this education provide
me with the passion to start a jewelry school? No. Do I have an MBA?
No. So what qualified me to found a school in the first place if I
didn’t have the necessary credentials? Absolutely none. What this
lady has in her desire to learn stone setting is energy, drive and
enthusiasm. If the man teaching her says he is “self taught” then he
is being honest.

If she makes a ring, sets a stone and it falls out, then who is
responsible? The self taught teacher or the student?

I’ve taught students who learn so fast and so quickly, that they are
five steps ahead of me. I’ve taught students that are passionate, but
if you opened their skull and poured the directly, they
will never understand the technique. Each challenge me the teacher to
be better at my craft, and to explain myself more clearly and to give
those that are good a challenge for themselves.

My one example is cooking. I love to cook. I watch tons of cooking
shows like it’s crack cocaine. I’m addicted to the process, the love
of ingredients, the hand dexterity, chopping, good knife skills, all
of it. I set myself a goal to cook for 85 people at Burning Man out
of one pot with all the love I could muster poured into it and
grateful bowls and forks lined up to receive my creation. I’ve
watched one of the best cooks I know make food that has connected me
to heaven and although I won’t say his name, he knows who he is. I’ve
learned and made dishes on my own with other ingredients which
friends have constantly urged me to open a restaurant. I cook because
I love it, but I’ve never been to cooking school. I’m self taught.

If an end product is made with love, with skill, with understanding
of a technique to produce something beautiful, does it matter who is
the “teacher” if there is one at all? And those brain surgeons?
Well, they make mistakes too and all the certifications, education
and diplomas can’t make up for an error. So, if the nice lady is
having fun setting stones, I hope she is enjoying what she is doing
and sets lots of stones.

Karen Christians
Cleverwerx

you can practice and learn the craft of jewellery making by working
with metal. 

Helen, I dare say that is the ONLY way to learn it. Books, teachers,
Orchid itself can only function to inform about procedures and
technique. But words are not skill. To get the skill you have to do
stuff. So keep doing it and never mind the naysayers. The proof is in
the pudding. Take your validation from your accomplishments, not your
associations.

but don't argue with a Phd about their field, 

I don’t necessarily agree with that. One of the other things I do is
write poetry. I have a friend/mentor who is a multiple PhD, a
contemporary of Allen Ginsburg, a published author in her own right.
I don’t blindly take what she says as gospel. I consider it carefully
but if I feel my way on some point or other is the better way for me,
well, hell, its my ball, its my game. I’ll either be vindicated or go
down in flames.

I had another PhD tell me if I want to get published I should drop a
certain four letter word from a particular piece. But that word was
critical to the whole point of the poem, at least in my eyes. Well, I
read that piece at a number of open mics with good reception and even
made the final round of a slam once with that word in it. For a shy
guy that’s quite a feat, overcoming fear/doubt, public speaking is
not my thing. Anyway the word stayed in, I got my validation. I
connected. I did it my way.

BTW the two PhDs disagreed about the word.

Sorry, didn’t mean to get so self revealing.

You're saying what I've tried to say, that it's experience which
counts - years and years of experience. It doesn't matter whether
you're taught by someone else, or whether you've learned via books,
etc - as long as you put the years of labour into it, then your
work is capable of being as good as someone who had lessons.
Different routes to the same destination. 

Indeed. People comment on the finish and details of my knives. ‘How
do you do that?’, etc. I tell them, it comes from 35 years of making
silver jewelry. If you can still see after that time, you’ll be good
at it. LOL!

Michael

I've been around lots of amazing people who didn't know squat about
jewelry, tinkered with it and not only make stunning work, find
innovative ways to approach traditional techniques, 

I said this long ago, and I’ll say it again here. There are all
sorts of people here on Orchid. There are many who are happy as clams
making what amounts to street fair jewelry and some even make a good
living at it. Good for them - really and truly. For those who are
happy where they are and have no real ambition to be more - good for
you, we are finished, have a good life. Really and truly.

I post on Orchid for those who seek excellence. I post on Orchid for
those who desire to be the very best in all things. People who DO
have ambitions and want to realize them. Of course you can string
crystal bracelets or solder simple bezels on shanks with 50 cent
stones in them or bend a piece of brass into a cuff bracelet and be
a jewelry maker and make at least a decent living at it. And do that
for the rest of your life and be happy…

It is most tiresome to have to say that over and over again.

Jo-Ann has been making jewelry for 25 years and doing quite well at
it, I must say. To this day she gives me filing and fitting jobs
because after all that time she just doesn’t have the training that
I do.

Here’s your job (stone setter…) You have 90 seconds average to
set these 5 pointers in 4 prong settings. They must be straight, all
the same height, with no windows in the bearing cuts, and finished
up ready for polish. In other words, we need this 100 stone tennis
bracelet in an hour.

I expect you to work at a leisurely pace and sip your coffee now and
then. It’s not a race, it’s ability - that’s a reasonable time for a
setter who’s a real setter. Here’s a handful of scrap - we want this
emerald set in this ring with these diamonds set in this jaunty
flair - we want to deliver Friday afternoon… And yes, it must
have style…

That’s professional work and it’s independent of design and style.
It’s knowing what to do and when every step of the way, and also
knowing higher level things - what some would call “tricks” that are
actually just how thingsare done in the goldsmithing business.

This part of this thread was begun by someone (I don’t recall who -
been traveling for a month, now) who essentially spoke an
uncomfortable truth. Yes, you can learn how to do a great many things
by yourself - I have, myself. No, you’re not (ever) going to be the
next Faberge without collaboration and training. There’s a whole
industry out there, with something like a trillion dollars a year in
sales, and some very professional people, too. Don’t discount the
value of that. There’s a very great deal of knowlege out there.