In the June 2010 issue of Lapidary Journal, a bronze medallion with
silver accents is featured on P. 32. To my surprise, even though the
medallion is constructed of bronze, it is stamped on the back as
"sterling." No stamps indicating bronze. It does bear the name of the
metalsmith which is R. Hales.
I am puzzled. I thought that if one stamped a piece “sterling,” it
would have to be made of sterling, and not of another metal and just
adorned with some sterling. Am I mistaken?
I am puzzled. I thought that if one stamped a piece "sterling," it
would have to be made of sterling, and not of another metal and
just adorned with some sterling. Am I mistaken?
You are correct, the item is illegally marked. If there is a
sterling stamp on it the whole item needs to be sterling.
From what I’ve been told the stamp should denote the lowest value
metal (in Australia), for example if you made a piece of Mokume Gane
out of 18ct yellow, 14ct rose, and 9 ct white, you have to stamp the
ring 9ct.