Art jewellery

Jo,

I did 2 years as a bench jeweler with a local goldsmith in my town 2
decades ago, and he always said American jewelers were inferior to
Europeangoldsmiths. True, the European goldsmiths were better
technicans, but we Americans were more creative. The trick is to
combine the two - the skill of the European goldsmith with the
imagination of an American. I put in a solid 3 years of jewelry
repair at 3 different fine jewelry stores and how I make my jewelry
is a direct influence from my repair days. I tend to overbuild my
jewelry, and make everything heavier and stronger. Just the way my
mind works.

It’s true Americans in general want the lowest prices and the best
quality, and unfortunately, it doesn’t quite work that way. If I had
my way, the best materials and best gemstones available, I would
use, but I have to stick to my clients’ budgets and cut corners so
they can say they got a bargain. When I do a jub, I ask for a
budget, materials, timeframe and then once I get the basic info, I
can proceed. Naturally, I livea a frugal (read, CHEAP) state.

Joy

In 1974 Larry Van Craeynest said to me that there are many
different types of jewelry. I believed him. 

There’s no particular reason to say that we and Richard Leaf are
acquainted in the real world but we are.

From his list I’ll pick out merry renk (sic) who was a good friend of
ours. On thing she and I had in common was irreverence and alow
tolerance for pretentiousness. She’d go to events in her honor, play
the part, eat the free food and drink the free wine and come back and
roundly ream the posers. Great fun, merry was, we miss her.

I’ll add some other art to Richard’s list:

Hello Kitty - If you want to say that great art is that which
touches people then Hello Kitty is great art foryoungsters, only
half facetiously. The Toyota Corolla The Minute Maid
Cranberry/Apple/Raspberry bottle on my desk. My computer mouse The
burl redwood clock on the wall My workbench - Otto Frei’s best The
vinyltile on the floor

There’s just a sensibility out there that somehowbeing an artist is
cool like being an astronaut is cool. “We are the priesthood of the
creative mind, and heaven forbid you deny us!” Well, I said
irreverence, above. Shrug…John

You want great art jewelry, look to Van Cleef, Boucheron, maybe
Mauboussin - look for the high jewelry not the bread and butter
lines.

Dear Richard… I checked out the galleries mentioned. My goodness,
such prices they get for basically taking a small amount of effort to
put a post or hook on a piece of garbage. $90 for putting a silver
hook and ring on an Italian or Chinese made flat glass flower with a
hole in the middle is what they want for one pair. It also appears
from this display that there is no limit to the laziness and lack of
shame of certain “art” jewellery creators. How on earth could a piece
of glass on a hook be art, let alone the other pieces of trash
they’re hanging off hooks be something you’d be proud to produce and
promote. There were a few actually bezelled in 14kt gold gems, and
those are over $5,000! I seriously suggest everyone get a reality
check by following your advice and check these “art” jewelers out.
It’s totally amazing what passes for art. Can this be a true
reflection of our current society?

Mary Jane

Come on Folks!

There has always been room for everything made and a market for all
of it, and the resentment that is peeking through these discussions
is simply a waste of your good time and energy.

What difference does it make in your work, if someone else is making
work that is of what you perceive as inferior quality and design?
Let 'em make it, let 'em sell it (if they can), let 'em sell it for
high prices. what does it matter re: your own work.

I have shown my work in many venues, and even though those venues
have been juried events, there has always been work that I consider
to be of inferior quality or design or construction. it kinda sneaks
in. I used to be distressed that there was this ‘other’ work; that
potential customers would be confused, assuming that since the event
was juried, all the work HAD to be great, desirable and lustworthy.
I gave up that attitude. I just make the best work I can (my
perspective here) and talk to everyone at my booth about why MY work
is great! In some ways, it’s a good thing there is the range of
quality and design in our field. it gives our collectors the
opportunity to make comparisons, to decide where their personal
aesthetics reside, and to learn how to choose work based on that
decision.

We can whine about nomenclature, quality, design sense, what
constitutes ART, but in the end, all that matters, really, is how we
make our own work, how we feel about our own work, and how our
collectors feel about our own work.

So, please, make let’s just make our good stuff and let’s not
continue to beat this subject to death, again and again and again.
It’s only a good thing that there are so many creative minds at work
in our field. making stuff is a good thing and making our stuff, no
matter what its called or the quality, is better, at the very least,
than making war machinery.

So like Fred Babb’s great T-shirts and posters say, “Go to you
studio and make stuff!”. Great advice.

Linda Kaye-Moses

This group is at its best when we engage in combined interest and
helpfulness. Someone comes up with some strange question or a photo
of an arcane tool, and we respond with our best or
advice. Sometimes we build answers one piece upon another, until we
arrive at a final answer, or many potential answers. In this regard
we are a community, and a strong, resourceful and unified one at
that. New or customized solutions are developed in tandem with the
resources and talents of one another, and it is great and powerful.

But there is another manifestation of this group, one that is
exemplified by this “Art Jewellery” posting subject, that is
judgmental, officious, sanctimonious and downright mean-spirited, and
that doesn’t “become” us.

You don’t like “art” jewelry. fine, but this relentless, endless
diatribe against the makers who identify themselves as artists and
their creations as manifestations of personal expression, and the
schools that approach this craft of ours as an artistic endeavor, is
self-righteous and unwelcoming.

It stuns me because it is the opposite of my experiences within the
jewelry/metals/artists/makers community that I’ve met as I’ve
learned and practiced my craft/art.

During the entire tenure of this “Art Jewellery” posting subject,
not one maker who identifies as an artist has pointed an accusing or
mocking finger at those who identify as “bench” jewelers. All this
bitterness and aggression is one-sided. And it is bitter. And it is
aggressive. And frankly, it’s pretty ugly.

You’re (YOU know who YOU are) going on about ‘craft’, making lists
of things that people better be able to do. or else. But if you
haven’t yet, try taking your eyes away from the masterpieces created
by Rene Lalique, and take a look at the jewelry pieces that Alexander
Calder or Harry Bertoia made as an extension of their monumental and
ground-breaking sculpture and design; the realized creations of their
brilliant, curious, artistic hands and spirit, would never pass your
tests, and yet. they are stunning and splendid and sublime. They are
transformational. They are historic. They are ART. Wearable ART.

For the record, I’ve had five main teachers during my journey
learning to manipulate metals into art/craft/jewelry/whatever you
want to call it.

Three taught/teach at the community college level, and two at adult
education classes. They have all, each and every one, been
accomplished and engaging and helpful and nurturing and prodding and
demanding. They have designed projects that allow their students to
build successive techniques into their repertoire and take risks with
increasingly challenging designs. And not one of them would ever be
so mean-spirited and dismissive toward a group of students, let alone
teenagers embarking on their first voyage into metal-working, as one
of the posters here, who cheerfully related his verbal evisceration
of these kids’ first attempts, in comments - made to the kids
themselves. Their teacher’s efforts to build interest and excitement
in these kids to do something with their hands besides texting and
playing games on their smart phones were undone by his thoughtless
and wildly unhelpful criticism. It may have made him feel good and
superior, but at the expense of those kids, who live and die
(metaphorically) with their peer image and sense of self-respect.
There was plenty of time, for those who might have been enticed into
continuing with metal-working, for perfectly sanded edges, smooth,
tight rivets, and a great finish.

If any of you are feeling put-upon and castigated by this post,
well, I’m writing this because that is how your missives have been
making me feel with your blanket dismissal of jewelry as art, writ
with smugness and scorn. I haven’t attacked your craft at all, only
your ridicule of others who create differently than you. I would
suggest that you look at wearable metal that is completely unlike
what you create with an open eye and heart, and, perhaps, take a few
minutes to read those terrible, awful, “how-dare-they” artist’s
statements, and see if you can find some small space for appreciation
of them in your version of jewelry. If you can’t, please just show us
the common courtesy of moving on and off of this subject. You’ve said
more than enough already. Thank you.

Can this be a true reflection of our current society? 

Yeah, well Mary Jane, it’s called picking the low hanging fruit, but
also thinking that that’s all there is to have. You can’t say
anything because then you are the bad guy and “But you don’t
understand” and yadda yadda, but it’s really quite sad. John

Hi Thomas old friend and Orchid folks, I watched the Art jewellery
thread for over a week and swore I was not going to respond but just
could not resist.

I recently did a demonstration at a national event. After I was done
6 or 7 fine arts graduate students in University metal programs were
asking me about jobs.

They wanted to work in the jewelry industry and wanted to find a
place they could apprentice and learn more marketable skill while
retaining their dream of being independent art jewelers. They all
had student loans of many thousands of dollars. One young couple
between them had over 80k in loansand were not finished with
graduate school.

In this group only one of them had appropriate skills to land a
jewelry job. They all could set a bezel but had no skills to set a
faceted stone. The one young ingenious graduate took a bench job at
a pawn shop for very low pay were she learned some valuable bench
skills from a seasoned stone setter. I know there are thousands of
success stories of art jewelers who cameout of programs like these.
I want to mention that there are many programs that offer stone
setting classes. My gripe is that all metal / Jewelry programs should
offer one stone setting class, or at least fund one visiting
professional stone setting class (5 intensive days can produce
results)to expose them to some simple marketable techniques that
will also aid in their quest of being a successful Art Jeweler if
they choose.

Sessin Durgham

Hi Michele

you need to read the posts on art jewellery again. And read them
closely

try taking your eyes away from the masterpieces created by Rene
Lalique, and take a look at the jewelry pieces that Alexander Calder
or Harry Bertoia made as an extension of their monumental and
ground-breaking sculpture and design; the realized creations of
their brilliant, curious, artistic hands and spirit, would never
pass your tests, and yet. 

The last part of your statement (my underlining) is so wrong. The
above people are artists, Rene Lalique was used as an exemplar in
one of my posts. It is not resentment it is more disgust that people
who have no intention of making quality in either manufacture or
design call themselves jewellers or artists. But promote some
supercilious/specious statement as their raison d’etre. Yes the
emperor has no clothes.

As those who have posted on this topic have often mentioned TRUE
jewellery artists Lalique and Boucheron are two. Torun is one of my
favourites and with customers like Picasso she was judged by real
artists.

What do these three have in common? Quality design, highest quality
construction and wearability of the pieces produced.

The exact opposite of the self-professed jewellery artists.

On of the things I like about Orchid is that we can have a sardonic
laugh at the pretentious in this trade.

And be in awe of the masters who make the most amazing pieces and
show HIDIs on Orchid.

So what do I think of artist statements? Here is mine.

At Moonrising:
When the wings of night enfold you
And the weirdstone enraptures
It is the time for fascination and enchantment!

To be enraptured by my jewellery is my aim and to fascinate or
enchant with it is the game. A game the “wise” ladies well know how to
play.

all the best
Richard

Hi all

making lists of things that people better be able to do. or else. 

My list was it? Well if you can’t do the basics then you will just
make rubbish. No matter how you try to justify low quality.

not one maker who identifies as an artist has pointed an accusing
or mocking finger at those who identify as "bench" jewelers. 

Hello because they are bench jewellers. They make art and quality
not “Art Jewellery”. And how could an Art Jeweller belittle a bench
jeweller.

" Oh look at that bench jeweller. LOL They can alloy gold and cast
it and roll it. And then they fabricate it into a piece of jewellery.
Clean up and polish it to a mirror shine. And then they set precious
gems into it. And it will last for and be admired generations. How
pathetic. And they sell it with out an Artist’s statement."

Yeah that cr*p is really going to fly isn’t it. A few bench
jewellers come to mind Rene Lalique, Murrle Bennet and Torun.

There are hundreds of others that could be added to that list.

all the best
Richard

Hi all

They wanted to work in the jewelry industry and wanted to find a
place they could apprentice and learn more marketable skill while
retaining their dream of being independent art jewelers. They all
had student loans of many thousands of dollars. One young couple
between them had over 80k in loansand were not finished with
graduate school. 

That is why I liked studying at “The School for Silversmiths” the
cost was excellent still only $95 a day. Went one day or evening a
week and made jewellery to sell the rest of the week. We sold
jewellery and paid for the classes and materials. The first project
was to make a sphere from 2 hand cut disks of 2 inches diameter.
Really annoyed me.

Asked the teacher why did I have to do this. “Because if you can’t
finish this you will never be a silversmith.” So i finished it and
made a pendant with the 2 halves sliding up a chain. Sold it and
annoyed the next class with “I sold it.” Kept carrying on till till I
was told by my friend if you don’t shut up I will insert this mandrel
etc.

We were taught all aspects of silversmithing and in the same class
had beginners to high quality professionals. All sharing and learning.
The workshop was fully stocked and we just brought our own hand
tools. We were shown how to use everything but I think most
importantly we were taught how to make with the most basic tools so
we could make at home albeit much more slowly but still of high
quality. You don’t need a lot of tools to make quality jewellery. You
just have to design to the manufacturing equipment you have. This
week I am going to make some earrings out of 1.5 mm round wire. Old
designs but good sellers.

Will wrap the wire round a dowel and use pliers to form into spiral
twists. Simple beautiful and proven seller. I will also reticulate
some sterling for rings and set some gems into solitaires. And of
course make some more mobius rings.

One thing we were taught was that Art Jewellers wrote for grants and
silversmiths (also work in gold) made jewellery that sold and did not
need grants.

all the best
Richard

Way to go, Michele!

Linda K-M

Bravo Michele…a simple phrase, if I may. One man’s trash is
another man’s treasure.

But there is another manifestation of this group, one that is
exemplified by this "Art Jewellery" posting subject, that is
judgmental, officious, sanctimonious and downright mean-spirited,
and that doesn't "become" us.

The other day I was looking at a book given to me in 1978 on the
Scandinavian art jewelry movement. I just happened to open to a page
that described the jewelers as very skilled.

The work they made was very crude looking but with their skill and
knowledge the very crude work is very well executed. I wish I had the
book in front of me so I could quote it.

I have not read all the post so I can’t comment on them, but if
someone put down students shame on them, also I agree that it is not
right to put down art jewelry. But, I do not agree that it is wrong to
comment on quality of construction. Many of the post I have read talk
about the quality and the possibility of an art jeweler to get a job.
Many of the people on this list are classically trained and do great
art jewelry. Most of the great artist of the past were well trained
and then went out of the box. Many of the great rock musician were
classically trained and created the best rock and roll. In fact for
the sake of discussion it would be very interesting to know how many
rock and roll groups were formed in the 70’s by just kids with no
training that went nowhere vs. the classically trained groups.

With all of that said, I would rather have a kid out of high school
that took auto shop as an apprentice rather than a graduate from a
college with a jewelry degree. One of the big problems I see in the
art jewelry world is that someone will take a jewelry workshop and
then they start teaching what they learned. Amateurs teaching
amateurs. Even the magazines have articles and how to’s written by
amateurs.

So to try to end my post if you want to be an art jeweler fine, just
don’t think you are going to get a job as a jeweler. And if you want
to be a GREAT art jeweler, master the basic techniques of fine
jewelry.

Bill Wismar

Here is some interesting reading from some folks working in ART
jewelry with a perspective that is very different to what those of
us who are not a part of the ART or CONTEMPORARY jewelry sphere
assume. I will not try to summarize it but they are all critiques of
ART Jewelry or CONTEMPORARY Jewelry which in my mind are pretty much
the same but at least one off the authors draws a distinction. To me
these items describe in a of bit dense prose what in my opinion is
wrong with where ART Jewelry has been focusing its attention for the
past couple of decades.

I especially like this paragraph from Ezra Satok-Wolmanpiece in
Klimt02:

“We have not failed in our efforts to communicate Art Jewellery to
the public. That has been proven by the exponential growth of Art
Jewellery, its related activities, and the number of institutions
that now support it. What we have failed to do is provide content
that people want to buy, wear, celebrate and connect with. We have
“broken the circle of jewellery” by removing the wearer from the
equation, not only by neglecting the wearability of jewellery, but
by assuming that people will want to wear what we make just because
“We” have made it. Todays art jewellery not only requires a
tremendous amount of interpretation to understand, but much of it
requires a sojourn in a mental institution to decipher what are
often overly personal and disturbing declarations. Why did we think
people would want to wear our emotional baggage on their bodies in
the first place? Adornment is about the wearer, and often about
making the wearer feel a certain way. More often than not people
choose to wear a piece of jewellery because it makes them feel good,
esthetically, or because of a sentimental connection “they” have
with the piece. Art jewellery has abandoned the idea that jewellery
should be beautiful, and replaced it with the decree that “Art
Jewellery is what we say it is whether you want to wear it or not!”
Can we really question why much of it isn’t selling? I often wonder
whether galleries are representing the artists they represent
because they believe in the work and think that they will have
success selling it, or whether it is merely because they want to
exhibit the flavor of the month.”

Anyhow I think it is all worth reading.

You have to scan down to Liesbeth den Besten’s piece on this one:

http://www.ganoksin.com/gnkurl/ep81fd

James Binnion
James Binnion Metal Arts

Thank you, Linda, Richard Leaf and those few others who have
expressed a rational tone in what seems to be a perennially negative
and intolerant pile on when it comes to the topic of Art Jewelry and,
more often, Artists’ Statements. I have responded to this thread
several times over the years and I had decided to let it go when it
inevitably came ‘round again unless I saw others address the negative
and often snarky commentary directed at the topic of Art Jewelry and
Artists’ statements. And now some have.

Let me say first that I feel strongly about craftsmanship. And I am
disappointed in what I have seen in some of the work coming out of
schools where craft is concerned. I call myself a jeweler/metalsmith
but I have no allegiance to metal or stones. Really, anything goes in
my studio regarding materials as long as they meet my personal
requirements for duarability and, at times, wearability. These
include ping pong balls, quills and plastic chickens. For me it is
the ethos of metalsmithing and jewelry making that is important. The
devotion to making a high quality and well-made object, carefully
considered from all angles, all details attended to. It doesn’t
always work that way, but I always try to hit that bar.

I hope that I am not the only one who has grown tired of (what I see
as) a knee-jerk reaction to anything that doesn’t cleave to what is
becoming an increasingly narrow definition on this forum of jewelry
design and conception. I am also sad that relatively few Orchidians
seem to speak up in counter-argument to those voices that are raised
in condemnation of Art Jewelry and Artists’ Statements. I have never
to my recollection read any posts mocking traditional, classic or
mainstream jewelry. No proclamations that art jewelry be this or that
or that a piece is somehow not valid if it is not accompanied by a
statement. No posts dismissing traditional, gem stone or design
oriented jewelry as clich=e or uninspired. The only dismissive or
mocking tone that I have encountered is aimed at Art Jewelry.

Some posts sound like the response of a hurt or marginalized child,
picking the sand out of their eyes that has been kicked there by Art
Bullies.

To be sure, schools are most certainly encouraging students to write
statements. And some are really bad. But the simple fact is that
some people just want to know more. An artist’s statement can offer
that. Certainly that doesn’t excuse bad, dishonest or pretentious
statements. But it also doesn’t condemn all statements. Many movies
now include a “Making of…” feature on the dvd. And “Story behind
the song” shows are common on cable. Do these features somehow ruin
the thing that they are expanding? I doubt that the actors or
directors are outraged or insulted that someone wants more
about a particular movie or song than they have gleaned
from watching or hearing. How is a good, honest artist’s statement
any different?

I hope that those younger or emerging jewelry makers and metalsmiths
on Orchid will heed the technically oriented posts and those posts
regarding the need for great craftsmanship while taking the rants
against statements and Art Jewelry with a very large grain of salt.

Awaiting the inevitable response and occasional personal digs.

Andy

but this relentless, endless diatribe against the makers
who identify themselves as artists and their creations as
manifestations of personal expression 

That’s quite a diatribe, Michele. We ARE special, we ARE, we ARE.
The point of what you want to seemingly dismiss is that we have met
the enemy and he is us. Jewelry has been made by mankind since the
beginning of time. The Worshipful Hall of Goldsmiths in London
received it’s charter in 1327. That universities in America started
teaching arts and crafts style jewelry making in the 60’s isn’t
evena blip on the radar, and neither am I.

Yes, there is a worldwide jewelry industry and much of that would be
called cottage industry - people in Peru or wherever pounding out
whatever they pound out. There are machineshops churning out
findings, chains and wedding bands, there are folks sitting in the
back of retail stores doing bad ring sizings, and there are people
sticking findings together and selling it as jewelry. I’m guessing
thatthere’s something like 30% of us who are doing just exactly what
you are doing, some of us are just doing it better than you are. We
are sitting here making our self expression and our art, our way,
but we just don’t havethis strange neediness about the label of
"artist". It is the university systems that created a rift when they
stood up and said, “we are artists, they are mere technicians”.
Actually, we are all just the same, those of us who actually design
and make original jewelry. Yes, there do exist pure technicians. As
I said earlier on this thread, as long as “those people” are clich=ed
then we can be superior. When you realize that I, for instance, am
just you 40 years later then it’s different, isn’t it? I clawed and
scraped my way to the top and paid my dues to get here, that’s all.

Walking into Orchid and announcing that you are an artist and your
work is art, dammit, is like walking into the New York Philharmonic
and announcing that you are a musician and you make music, dammit.
Ho hum…

That I make a commercially viable product doesn’t make me a
mechanoid, it makes me smart. And successful. John D.

andrew cooperman, You put into words my thoughts. I really
appreciate your thoughtful response to this thread. Barbara

All in all, I find myself torn about the subject. First and
foremost, my endgame, isn’t to be a jeweler per say. Though, I do
expect a lot of work to be in this vein.

My intent is to be a metal artist. Jewelry, to me, seems to be the
perfect battlefield to learn the subject. It is here, that I feel is
the best place to learn technique, finishing and overall other
skills.

It only seems logical that if you can make something look Excellent
from a very close up view (such as jewelry) then you can make
something look good from far away (with that, the knowledge of how
much you can back off of your finishing to achieve the required
quality can only come from the knowledge of close inspection)

This attitude comes from a graphics background (many years ago now.)
To even this day, people in the “graphics” business do not
understand things like resolution. A tertiary concern to my current
job, but I see it a lot. There are many graphic artists that don’t
understand that quality comes from both “size"and"resolution” of a
document. This saddens and frustrates me. I see (again, to this day)
comments such as “but it’s 300 PPI). Well, that’s great! 300PPI at
1/2” does not mean squat if you want the same image at 20’

I digress. Point is, that something that is to be viewed at close
inspection such as jewelry or a magazine page, has to be of greater
quality than something that is to be viewed from 50’ away.

I am learning the close view quality, so that I can later work for
things that will be viewed from a distance, and not look like Cr@p
if viewed closer.

Part of the issues, IMHO, is in the “arts” arena, there is soooo.
much competition that often being extremely prolific is the only way
to get noticed. Corners get cut, and worse yet. there is the
mentality that teaches this mentality.

Frankly, there will always be more crap than quality. I hope to not
fall into that trap.

Regarding “Art Jewelry” Quality aside, the wearability of things. or
lack of, is really just amusing and yes, often ridiculous. but This
doesn’t bother me. I find Andy Warhol works "most of them"
ridiculous too.

If the intent is more to be “art” than jewelry. Sure, Liberties can
be taken.

Silk Screens of Campbell’s soup cans any one?

My 22c

Chris Lund
Unlearned and Unskilled Jewelry-Smith.

Hi all

also I agree that it is not right to put down art jewelry. 

Jewellery that is really Art has not been criticized great jewellers
who are artists work has been put forward as examples of Art
Jewellery.

What has been criticized are the unwearable and poorly constructed
pieces that come with overblown artist statements.

There has also been criticism of poorly made classical jewellery.
Many posts about mass produced low quality chain store jewellery.

Wisdom would dictate that the posts are read and a higher level of
construction is achieved.

One of the big problems I see in the art jewelry world is that
someone will take a jewelry workshop and then they start teaching
what they learned. 
Amateurs teaching amateurs. Even the magazines have articles and
how to's written by amateurs. 

Youtube is full of these “experts”.

So to try to end my post if you want to be an art jeweler fine,
just don't think you are going to get a job as a jeweler. And if
you want to be a GREAT art jeweler, master the basic techniques of
fine jewelry. 

The above is very true.

So lets just make it clear. Jewellery that is well made, wearable
and Art is not being criticized. The opposite has been criticized.

Neither have materials used been criticized. Viviana Torun picked up
stones from the beach to use in her jewellery. Perhaps today’s Art
Jewellers would do well to research Torun’s jewellery. She is one of
the most copied jewellers of the modern day.

I copy some of her designs to study aspects of design and
construction. Some of her simple and elegant pieces require much
more skill than is at first viewing apparent. One can learn from the
masters by copying their work and then learn to extend from there.

Some posts sound like the response of a hurt or marginalized
child, picking the sand out of their eyes that has been kicked
there by Art Bullies. 

Really? I think the posts are by jewellers quite secure in their
skills and success in the business. I think emotion overrides
comprehension in many cases, as well posts are not read closely to
gain understanding of what the message really is.

but if someone put down students shame on them, No recollection of
students being put down, some biting remarks at graduates though. 

The quote by Ezra Satok-Wolmanpiece in James post is just classic
and so true. The whole article is well worth reading and makes very
many good comments on Art Jewellery.

all the best
Richard

Enough. Talk about WE, WE, WE. All I read in posts like yours John,
which really is a diatribe to my eyes, is ME, ME, ME.

I read bitterness and hurt at some perceived slight from the art
world.

A