I know I’m about to annoy a variety of my colleagues but I think
it’s important to get this right.
Enthusiasm should not take over solid scientific research. We have
to be truthful.
All these following quotes form the correspondence on Ganoksin are
about research into colloidal, ionic or silver compounds.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/513362
This refers to ionic silver and is a secondary resource.
G.V. James, Water Treatment, 4th Ed., CRC Press, Cleveland, OH, p.
38 (1971).
This too is about ionic silver reactions.
I.E. Wacks, C.B. Wang, G.Deo, "Interaction of Polycrystalline
Silver with Oxygen, Water, Carbon Dioxide, Ethylene, and Methanol:
In Situ Raman and Catalytic Studies," Jour. of Physical Chemistry
B, Vol. 103, p. 5645 (1999).
Is not applicable to medicinal usage but a study of catalytic
reaction.
Samuel F. Etris, Richard L. Davies, "The Development and Functions
of Silver in Water Purification and Disease Control," The Silver
Institute Newsletter (1995).
This is about colloidal silver
The last appears to be propaganda and is not a research paper. It is
also a tertiary source…
Samuel F. Etris, “Why Silver Kills Germs & Heals Wounds,” The Silver
Institute Newsletter (2003).
Some silver compounds (having silver as an ionic component) and
silver in very fine suspension (colloidal) have antibacterial
properties and have been successfully used in the treatment of
wounds and infections. The reason is that pure silver in its
colloidal and ionic forms converts and absorbs tiny amounts of
oxygen breaking it up into the nascent form. This is highly reactive
and oxidizes carbon molecules that come into contact with it.
Sterling silver, or even pure silver, by itself seems to have no
application. Using silver utensils in no way has been demonstrated
to have similar properties. If it did then silver plated objects
would have the same properties.