Reality Check - The Sarasota Art League

Dear Artists,

We always welcome input from the artistic community we have chosen
to serve-it is our reality, and our mission to create an environment
where the arts flourish-on Arts Day and every day.

And, so, in the spirit of creativity, and community, we still
welcome Irene Ausley-van Eepoel’s participation in the Hands-On area
(not the Children’s area), where the deadline was still open at the
time of our initial offer, and where she may still sell her art as
part of her livelihood, and where a program will indicate her
presence, so her customers may find her on Arts Day.

Unfortunately, we did not receive the messages she recalls leaving
at the “Art League”. It’s possible she left them with an art league,
and not at our “Arts Council” office. Nor did we receive an
application-which is posted on our website, so that everyone has
access to it at any time. Though our records and our committee
members do not reflect her participation in Arts Day 2005; she is
welcome to join us at Arts Day 2006.

We must maintain the integrity of our jury, deadlines and procedures
in order to be fair to all. I stand by our Arts Day Director Keren
Shani Lifrak because of her integrity to our jury process. I wish
every artist who participates in Arts Day a fun and successful day -
including Ms. Ausley Eepoel, if she chooses to join us.

Happy Holidays!

Patricia Caswell
Executive Director

Here is a note from an artist participating in Arts Day this year:

Keren Shani-Lifrak and the stafff of Arts Day 2006 have been very
helpful. There was a problem transmitting the images for my
husband’s work for the show and she was kind enough to notate his
file until the images were received. Keren’s genuine customer service
skills and empathy is the reason why Artist Berlin Casssamajor was
accepted in Arts Day 2006.

Natacha B Cassamajor

Also, by not doing the show are you burning a bridge? Perhaps
hurting your chances of participating next year? 

supposedly the joint decision of the 8 judges is the sole determinate
of acceptance for every year’s show.

I know it's a terrible situation to be in and I feel for you. But
maybe if you try and apologizing for the "miscommunication" (even
though she could have handled the situation much better, by perhaps
taking the time to look into it instead of throwing up the wall of
china)... 

amery, all of the smoozing approaches were tried (trust me on this,
having gotten elected and reelected to office, smoozing and sensitive
segues come as second nature when dealing with anyone with toes, egos
and say so’s)

show and how successful you've been and how much you've enjoyed it
in the past.... I know it's a little hard to swallow but this woman
might continue to throw up road blocks in the future. 

first, she’s been there 4 months and had nothing to do with past
shows and any praise of them could have been taken as a complaint of
this year’s show prepping to date. and from what has come back to me
it is possible i will not have to worry about an obstacle in 2007.

You know what they say: "keep your friends close and your enemies
closer". It's worth a shot. 

annh, amery, you don’t really want me to get any closer to someone
like that, do you really, really? it’s probable someone has kept ms
shani apprised of this thread (rope - halyard?) i mean, what if i run
out of pencils to clamp down on at that crucial moment my personal
space is invaded?

and for your compliment, i thank you.

ive

who believes that accurate, relevant words, used properly, can blunt
the sharpest sword.

Your response says it all. Of course you could not accept being in
the hands on area if you are working from ego consciousness and
from victimhood, because you would feel shamed and demoted and
compelled to tell and retell you sad story. That is an untenable
and unsavory position to be in, and therefore impossible.

In the original message, the artist indicated that he/she preferred
to work in precious metals excuslively and was reluctant to allow
young children to handle even small items in those materials. Is the
artist able and willing to explore the potential of designing and
making jewelry in other media? Talk to different craftspeople in the
local area, learn to work in paper mache, leather, copper, and other
much less expensive media. Have a “hands-on” demonstration for those
young children in the new media and allow them to actually make a
pair of earrings or a bracelet to give to the child’s mother. If
(when) another artist questions the new location and assignment in
the “childrens’ section” explain that you are trying to teach them to
become interested in jewelry. If (when) prior customers ask the same
questions, pull out a secure and locked display case with “regular”
items to offer the parents of the children in the hands-on section.

How could you have made it into a win-win, interesting day? If you
saw it as a challenge rather than a demotion and enlisted the very
people that the "hands on" area is for....children.......it could
possibly have had a different outcome.

By teaching the children how to actually make a jewelry item, even
using low cost material, and still offering regular clients the
opportunity to see and purchase regular products everyone (the
parents, the regular clients, and the Art League) could all become
winners in this situation.

Again, these are just thoughts.
James Good

james -

In the original message, the artist indicated that he/she
preferred to work in precious metals excuslively and was reluctant
to allow young children to handle even small items in those
materials. 

okay people, listen up! this thread has gotten worse than the old
game of “gossip”

first, there were no metal types mentioned in my original email.
second, i have excellent rapport with children, i’ve worked with ‘at
risk’ kids five to fifteen. and people, never look or talk down to a
child. never change your tone of voice or use juvenile words. never
TELL them what they think, ask them. almost all children are more
careful with my work than some adults and they usually like to hear a
quick version of how i cut the stones and metal. i take ‘rough’
(uncut rock material) as display stands and often give a sample to an
interested child and each one has a card with ‘lapidary’ info to
google. people, remember one thing about preschool to preteen kids
who come into your area: they are learning more in those years than
they will the rest of their lives - everything they encounter is new!
if you love your work, let them see that, fill some of their gray
cells with they can get only from you and will remember a
long time.

Is the artist able and willing to explore the potential of
designing and making jewelry in other media? Talk to different
craftspeople in the local area, learn to work in paper mache,
leather, copper, and other much less expensive media. 

while i used all of the aforementioned material, and more, working
with nonambulatory learning impaired, institutionalized, ‘kids’, i
see no reason for using them in my jewelry. not when i can transform
$15 worth of silver, $10 to $30 worth of stones/rough, some oxy/actyl
and grind/carve time, and get around $700 for it. my original post
was never about cost of material.

Have a "hands-on" demonstration for those young children in the new
media and allow them to actually make a pair of earrings or a
bracelet to give to the child's mother? 

i’ve done that more times than you’ve ever thought about it.

If (when) another artist questions the new location and assignment
in the "children's' section" explain that you are trying to teach
them to become interested in jewelry 

why would i worry about what to tell any other artist at a show?

If (when) prior customers ask the same questions, pull out a secure
and locked display case with “regular” items to offer the parents of
the children in the hands-on section.

i have never put my work in a “secure and locked display case” - and
from day one am missing only a pearl ring, which might have been
stolen but most likely got lost in the grass.

people, please listen to two more points,:

  1. the entire problem started with an error made by someone at the
    league staff level. i tried every reasonable suggestion i’d ever
    known, or heard about, to offer the contact person, ms shani, a way
    to rectify that error without accepting or being held responsible for
    that error. it was to my benefit to remain reasonable and strive for
    yet another solution so i could regain an artist’s space at the show
    i’d done for years. at every turn i was met with an obdurate attitude
    i’ve never encountered from any staff member at any show - images,
    the boca raton museum show, bonita springs january show, delray
    affair - i mean, for pete’s sake, this is an art show, not a black
    box government demonstration of a secret weapon. (which i have
    accessed) my primary interest in pursuing entry was admittedly
    financial, $2000 minimum to $4000 or more for one afternoon’s show
    within a dozen miles of my home.

  2. please do not, repeat, do not respond to any post from any orchid
    member WHEN YOU HAVE NOT READ THAT ORIGINAL POST. please.

thank you -

ive
who thanks the supporters but is puzzled by the ‘venters’

My dear Patricia Caswell,

I was surprised to read your post here on Orchid today, not only for
the content but that you had taken the time to write the email and
send it in light of the fact that on December 10th I sent an email
apprising you of my failure to receive an application and the
situation with Ms Shani as it then stood. When it was returned User
mailbox exceeds allowed size:

pcaswell@ I took the liberty to send it via another Arts Council
member, mschreiber@. I have no reason to doubt that Ms Schreiber did
not indeed forward it to you. To this date, December 24th, I have yet
to receive a response from you.

Had you contacted me two weeks ago there is every probability that
the in your email to Orchid would have been more
’relevant’ and up to date.

I wish the very best success for Arts Day. While I regret being
denied participation, my other regret is the possibility that the
artists’ section has been shifted from a section nurtured by an
accommodating staff (far from dictatorially rigid) concerned only
with exposing the public to art accomplished by enthusiastic artists,
into what could well be an event staged for impact in a future
resume. History repeats itself?

Less enthusiastic but still sincere,

Irene Ausley-vanEepoel
Sarasota Art League member
ive

Hi Everyone:

by october no application had arrived, left a voice mail request
at the main league number for one. nothing. after the third request
i received an application to be a 'volunteer' at the show. left yet
another voice mail request for artist's application. one more call
finally reached the person in charge of the artists' section, a ms
shani. hearing my application request, she informed me that i had
missed the deadline. 

With respect, this seems to have been left out of some of the
consideration in responses to the original post. The artist did
attempt, more than once, to obtain an application. The deadline, for
some reason, was not clear in this situation. She was sent the
incorrect material. It seems to be one great big mix-up.

Leaving the “be in the hands-on section and make the best of it”
factor out of the equation, what is the solution when an artist’s
application is just screwed up for whatever reason. I have seen at
least one person get declined from a show because her application was
“misplaced” for a while. Lets not forget that this is someone’s
livelihood. The artist is not doing it for fun, it’s her career.
Losing out on 2 to 4k in January could really mess up her finances.
Personally, I would have called every five minutes or so until I had
the correct application in my hands, but that’s just me. Obviously,
it would not be fair to the other artists in the show if the
everything was rejuried, but is there, perhaps, any other solution
that might be fair to everyone involved? Maybe I’m just looking thru
my rose-colored glasses again.

Best of luck to the artist, I hope things work out for you in the
long run

Best Regards,
Kim Starbard
Cove Beads

hi kim -

it would not be fair to the other artists in the show if the
everything was rejuried, but is there, perhaps, any other solution
that might be fair to everyone involved? 

you always put things in a polite way that takes the sting out of a
painful situation. the solution was so simple, one email with 7
copies to the 8 jury members:

"jury members, except for 2005, an artist has been juried into arts
day from it’s beginning. this year, due to a glitch in the league
office’s data base, the artist was not sent a 2006 application, we
are trying to make amends for our error and allow the artist to be
juried for the artists’ section. enclosed/attached is an image of the
artist’s work that you would have used to judge had you received the
artist’s application. according to the artist, ‘the work is original,
all artist created, and without commercial components.’ please take a
moment to check the image, determine the acceptability of the work
and reply with either a “:yes” or “no”.

once again, thank you for the time you have been so generous with as
a juror for arts day."

kim, admittedly i am computer illegitimate, but i wish someone in
the league had come up with such a solution.

it ain’t a swan song 'til…, well, i think the fat swan has sung.

ive

Ive,

it would not be fair to the other artists in the show if the
everything was rejuried, but is there, perhaps, any other solution
that might be fair to everyone involved?

So theoretically, if all the booths have been assigned to people who
submitted their applications by the deadline, how should they select
one to be kicked out of the show to be replaced by you who did not?
This would be fair to your mind if there was no way for one more
booth to be added?

I do not intend in any way to criticize the person who started this
thread, but the tone and direction it has taken has veered rather far
a field from answering the original questions which were posed to the
forum participants. Taking the neutral observer’s position on what
has been presented, there are a couple of issues which bear comment.

To ask that an additional artist be included after the fact, having
missed the deadline to apply, certainly would not be fair to those
artists who did comply with the application deadline and went through
the jury process. If any artist did not receive the application by
mail, as expected, it is contingent upon the artist to obtain it by
other means. If the artist’s phone messages were not responded to and
the artist felt participation in this event to be of significant
value and importance, the artist should have been more proactive in
the effort to contact the sponsors and obtain an application.

Any artist concerned about being able to contact the sponsors of
this event, who had the presence of mind to conduct a very simple
search on the internet for the Sarasota Arts Council, would easily
find a direct link to their website as well as immediate access to
the applications for the Arts Day event. Because the application was
available online it was equally available to anyone with internet
access, whether by private access from home or studio, or by going
online at a public library.

Requesting the inclusion of an additional artist after the deadline
has passed, and asking that the artist be grandfathered in based on
past year’s acceptance to the event was unreasonable. Assuming that
any artist’s work would have been automatically included based on
jury selections from previous years disregards the decision making
process and the free will of the jury, as well as discounting the
potential quality of work from the field of applicants who completed
their submissions within the imposed deadline.

Making demeaning and condescending remarks about the Arts Day
Director, by name, on a public forum, was unprofessional and uncalled
for.

Respectfully,
Michael David Sturlin
www.michaeldavidsturlin.com

Hi Mr Hart

it would not be fair to the other artists in the show if the
everything was rejuried, but is there, perhaps, any other solution
that might be fair to everyone involved?

So theoretically, if all the booths have been assigned to people
who submitted their applications by the deadline, how should they
select one to be kicked out of the show to be replaced by you who
did not? This would be fair to your mind if there was no way for
one more booth to be added? 

Actually, I hadn’t thought of your point when I wrote the line. It’s
a good point, however, I still don’t know the answer to it. It was
more of a question that I was posting, not an opinion on the subject.
There may be no fair way to add another artist to the show. The
answer may be that there is nothing that can or will be done at this
point. As the clerk had originally said, something like “there’s no
way I can get those 8 people back together”.

I really have no solution or message to send at this point. Ive may
be out of luck. The only point I would like to make on this whole
subject is one of being proactive in every situation that involves
your career.

What I mean is this: if you have to leave a message for someone, do
it by email. Always try to leave a trail for later. If you’re getting
the brush-off on the phone (and it is possible to do so) get in the
car and go get the application in person. When sending anything that
has to do with a deadline, send it by registered mail. Always have
someone sign for it. I work really hard (as do many of the people on
this list) I will be darned if I let someone who is maybe having a
bad day accidentally round file my application if there is anything I
can do to prevent it.

Actually (and this if totally hypothetical and actually
tongue-in-cheek) I am a small, frail-looking person and I sometimes
use this fact to my advantage. If I was told there was “nothing to be
done” I would try actually going to see the person. I would be polite
and look as pale as I could. I would put a little tear in the corner
of my eye and I would state my case in the nicest way possible. it
might work, it might not. If it didn’t, I would collect my self and
find a way to make the 2-4k that I needed in some other way. I can
guarantee that there are other shows (possibly better shows) that
could be done in the same time frame and yield better financial
results. I would give them if someone was interested. There’s always
another way to do things, it just depends if you are willing to let
yourself do things another way.

Best Regards,
Kim Starbard
Cove Beads

hi kim -

here are some more answers -

any other [jury] solution that might be fair to everyone involved? 

how about sending 8 copies of an email with an image to those same
judges who juried me in every other year, asking them to say yes or
no.

people who submitted their applications by the deadline, 

unlike me who never received her usual application with the deadline
on it - as the song goes : “so how can you miss what you never
[knew].”

how should they select one to be kicked out of the show to be
replaced by you who did not? 

people, we’re talking spaces in a show open to local residents only,
a few dozen, on a street where there have always been open slots -
plenty of ‘insertion’ space - not 300 artists in a parking lot.

If I was told there was "nothing to be done" I would try actually
going to see the person. I would be polite and look as pale as I
could. 

it occurred to me to go there, but i don’t do “pale and frail” - if
you could give some lessons to morph a 5’ 9" green eyed blonde into
‘helpless’, i am your student for life!

When sending anything that has to do with a deadline... get in the
car and go get the application in person. 

there was never a set time to send out applications, just as there
wasn’t a set deadline. so i didn’t miss what was never scheduled.
besides, i was dealing with carcinoma and surgeries during that time,
okay?

kim, i so appreciate people like you and the others who have been so
nice, you all have even canceled out a couple of nay-sayers who had
the time to write long negative posts on, and off, orchid but not the
time to read my initial post and get the correct - it’s
all in the archives and available all the time; thank heavens for
hanuman.

thanks - ive

who really needs to sit at the south beach bistro table with art and
discuss “is there really a dog?”