Your graphics girl doesn't know much. Check out
<http://www.diacca.com> all the pieces were scanned at 4000 DPI, and
saved as a tif and sent to the web master who is blown away by
the high quality of the images I am sending him. Pat
OK. I did. Certainly, the dpi resolution is fine. So is the
color. You’re doing, of course, brightly colored and not highly
reflective (like metal) surfaces, so the difference between your
objects and actual flat art is not very much, from the scanners
perspective. And yet, the limits of the scanner still show quite
a bit, once you think what to look for. Consider your low bowls
page. The top one is a beatuful image. Is it of a flat tile?
Could be. The fact that it is a bowl must be taken on trust, as
it doesn’t leave any clue to this fact in the scan. The second
one down says it’s 4 inches high. There is absolutely NO visual
clue to this in the very pretty image. You say it’s a bowl, I’m
sorry. It’s a tile, from your scan. The third one down does
have some weird shadows, that make it appear either as a
depressed bowl or a raised top hat shape. Can’t tell. Not even
sure it’s a 3D object, but something at least is happening…
The last one comes closes, with that unfortunate bright
reflection giving it’s 3D nature finally some identity for the
viewer. But it’s too bad it has to do it with such a bright
highlight instead of some more sublte depth and shadow that one
gets with a well lit slide. And even then, my eye at least,
reads it as a raised circular area in the center with the outer
square edges slumped away from the raised center. Is that what
you made? Your scatter pins worked better, but then they are all
essentially flat, aren’t they. The top one has an unfortunate
highlight lower right, and some of the others have similar
artifacts of the process, but all in all, they’re OK. Not
great, but acceptable. Now then. scan a finger ring for me,
will you? See how well THAT works out…
I’m not trying to cut you down, here. Frankly, for your glass
objects, given the nature of your work, the scanner actually does
a pretty decent job, and the images are attractive. but when you
step back a moment and look at them, they still have problems
that are easily solved when actually composing a shot with
movable lights and a camera lens. These are pretty good. But
they could be, with the correct equipment doing the photography,
fantastic. Now, they’re not. And of course your webmaster, not
being a photographer or a craftsperson, probably would never
notice the problems with the image. He/she sees the sharp
resolution and nice colors, and doesn’t realize there’s more to
see that isn’t there. Ask an experienced crafts photographer
about your images, not a webmaster, if you want an informed
opinion.
Hope this helps.
Peter Rowe