Conceptual Jewelry

I have worked with typewriter keys, and now work with keys from
computer keyboards 

I want to be clear about my comments about objects, first. I have
zero objection to someone who takes typewriter keys, for example, and
uses them as a kernel for something. My objection is to those who
simply pick them up, pin them to a wall and say, “Look what I did.”
Second, although this is a fascinating thread, to me - I greatly
enjoy everyone’s thoughts here - I’ll point out that the discussion
of “Is jewelry art?” no more has an answer than it ever has over the
centuries. I’m not trying to stifle it, just be aware if you’ve
forgotten. To me, saying “Jewelry is not art.” is true and not true.
At times it is, but mostly it’s not art, it’s design. I am an artist,
yes, but I consider my jewelry side to be as a “designer”. That’s
what many people object to in contemporary art - it has degraded from
art into merely design. If one gets a canvas and draws an artistic
line down the middle, or two, and accompanies it with some breathless
artspeak about “The Division of Space” - that is design, not really
art. I’m not presuming to define it, but most people consider art to
be a deeper thing than dividing space up - interior designers divide
space up every day. Finally, to swing into an entirely new direction,
and mostly for the students out there, I want to open up the subject
of. I wouldn’t say that the concept of “The Starving Artist” is a
myth, because I’ve done it myself. It is, though, usually someone who
isn’t very good at at and should do something else, or someone trying
to find their legs, as in my case. Art is not a glorious shrine, art
is a career path. Everybody in the world needs to make money, even if
that money is actually trade or something. Van Gogh never sold a
painting in his life (true), but it’s not because he didn’t try.
Paloma Picasso bought a stake in Tiffany’s with her inheritance,
Dali’s estate was in the tens of millions. Art, unless you are a
hobbyist, is simply a profession like any other, and that’s not, not,
not to say that art has to be “commercial”. So, for those of you/us
who want to make a living at art, how does that work? Craftsmanship.
If you want to be a guitarist, first you get a guitar and learn how
to play it, THEN you worry about the self-expression part. And the
same goes for jewelry, painting, or whatever. Art is turning the
mundane into something profound. If you get a piece of bread and glue
it to a wall with some skillful gallery mounting (I’ve seen it),
people will walk by it and say “Look at that!” But likely you’ll go
home hungry. If you paint or sculpt that piece of bread, apply color,
maybe some abstraction, then you are saying, “This is my VISION of a
piece of bread”. And that is Art at it’s fullest.

Hi Allan,

I also enjoy cruising online jewelry auctions [not eBay, the 'good'
ones 

I don’t see anything wrong with eBay. Many of the other online
auctions can’t stand up to the competition from eBay.

Richard
www.richard-whitehouse.co.uk

We all know what a bracelet is - I don't mean Orchid, I mean the
entire human race. And I don't mean design, I mean, "A bracelet is
a thing that goes on the upper arm in something like this fashion." 

I just wanted to ask if anyone saw the Nov.2006 cover of Art Jewelry
magazine? The bracelet on the cover had a diameter of over 6 inches
(15.2cm). Now, we got a lot of flack from some of our subscribers
that the bracelet we featured was “just not wearable,” yet I wore
that bracelet. Sure I couldn’t sit at my keyboard and type with it
on, but I know it was not made with that intension. The golden death
mask of Tutankhamen was not intended for daily wear either, unless
you where dead.

There are jewelry makers whose intention behind their jewelry is to
make us humans question our assumptions about what we think we know.
This is where art enters into the equation.

I make very wearable, designed jewelry that takes all the
artisanship, craftsmanship, and research that “art jewelry” should
require, but it does not intend to make people think about it. It’s
intention is to be beautiful, comfortable, and connect emotionally
with it’s owner, and that is a perfectly valid intention for making
jewelry. 99% of all jewelry made is probably made with this intent,
because it sells.

I also make jewelry that has a deeper meaning and is intended to make
the wearer think about the concepts encompassed within the piece, and
sometimes discomfort is intentional because confronting false
assumptions can be very uncomfortable.

For me it is the intention behind the jewel and the successful
communication of that intent (not it’s daily wearability/salability)
that indicates it is art.

Nanz Aalund
Associate Editor / Art Jewelry magazine
21027 Crossroads Circle / Waukesha WI 53187-1612
262.796.8776 ext.228

Now, we got a lot of flack from some of our subscribers that the
bracelet we featured was "just not wearable," yet I wore that
bracelet 

My one and only point about “we all know was a bracelet is” was
exactly that. Do what you will, just don’t expect the world to fall
in line with it, necessarily. Sometimes you will be innovative,
sometimes you’ll be just plain wrong.

I also enjoy cruising online jewelry auctions [not eBay, the
'good' ones 

Some “good” ones (I also cruise them):

http://www.gallery68.com

http://www.goantiques.com Huge and mixed quality

http://www.sjphillips.com Not an auction but superfine stuff.

http://www.wartski.com Ditto

http://www.heritagejewellery.co.uk Ditto ditto

And of course:

http://www.christies.com and http://search.sothebys.com

Christies and Sotheby’s are so deep it’s best to search the auction
archives, and even that can be hard to find, but it’s there.
Christies also has a photo archive that’s cool.

I have zero objection to someone who takes typewriter keys, for
example, and uses them as a kernel for something. My objection is
to those who simply pick them up, pin them to a wall and say, "Look
what I did.

Actually John that’s pretty funny because about a year ago I turned
a corner and saw just that - a computer keyboard with the cord cut,
glued to the wall, it made me laugh and it made me think.

Was the person saying “I could make art on the computer - but I’m
putting this here”? Depending on your view of graffiti, maybe this
was art.

alison
In Melbourne waiting for the cool change
www.alialexander.com.au

about a year ago I turned a corner and saw just that - a computer
keyboard with the cord cut, glued to the wall, it made me laugh
and it made me think. 

Hmmm, that’s interesting-- It does seem as though a computer
keyboard stuck to a wall in, say, a gallery would merit no more than
a shrug, but as “graffiti”-- stuck to, as I imagine it, a brick
outside wall of a random city building (at a rakish angle) would be
thought provoking. Context makes a huge difference. Like, a hoop in
an earlobe is not going to get any attention, but put it in some
less-expected spot, and there is a message there that is quite
different, even if it is only “ouch!”

Not sure what to conclude, but I will add that, personally, I feel
no more necessity to nail down the definition (existence) of art
than I do the definition (existence) of God. In fact, I will go so
far as to say that these uncertainties, along with many others,
enrich our universe. I am reminded of a quote which, sadly, I cannot
attribute: “The purpose of philosophy is not to close questions, but
to keep them open”.

On a side note-- I just did a search to see if I could find the
source of the quote and–oops!-- the only reference is to a very
similar post I wrote on this forum in March 2005, in response to a
very similar thread. Nice to know I still agree with myself!

Noel

The golden death mask of Tutankhamen was not intended for daily
wear either, unless you were dead. 

This is a very important point. Never mind the death masks,
either–what about the collars worn in life by the ancients? Those
Egyptian collars were so heavy they were made with counter-weights.
Is “ceremonial jewelry” not jewelry? Should the historians be forced
to call it something else?

As for whether these collars are Art… (Ah, where is ive when we
need her?) I don’t think the ancient Egyptians had such a concept. My
history of psychology professor used to say, “Individuality and
intimacy are the Siamese twins of modernity.” I think Art may be
their little brother.

Lisa Orlando
Albion, CA, US

Actually John that's pretty funny because about a year ago I
turned a corner and saw just that - a computer keyboard with the
cord cut, glued to the wall, it made me laugh and it made me think. 

Many years ago, at the Houston modern art museum, I gathered my
group around a fire hose – you know, the actual fire hose they would
use in a fire – and we discussed it as art. Others gathered around
us to see the “piece.”

Elaine

Elaine Luther
Metalsmith, Certified PMC Instructor
http://www.CreativeTextureTools.com
Hard to Find Tools for Metal Clay