comparison means taking two or more things and objectively making
statements, coming to conclusions based on some sort of standards
laid side by side and observing the results, etc…
While Mike Zagielski is a wonderful man, great salesman, and works
for a fantastic sub company of an even better parent
company-(blackstone industries) I did not get an iota of comparison
from your post. Foredom does make great equipment backed by
reasonable warranties, and tools and accessories that exceed others
standards on the market ( a case in point is their Allset Master
system, that I can’t endorse enough for saving time, money and
allowing even a relative novice bench jeweler, or hobbyist to
achieve perfect results every time - when the equipment is used and
maintained properly)… but so does Pfingst. Buffalo Dental, and a
myriad of other pendant motor manufacturers.
All too often on Orchid i have seen the trend id to go with the most
advertised name, as though it were the only brand acceptable or made
to x tolerances and standards… that is simply not the case.
Pfingst, for instance makes pendant motors and backs their products
for the virtual life of the product, and when inquiring about one of
their tools, or motors refers to it’s birthdate- that tells any
consumer (or should at least intimate to the consumer) that Pfingst
knows and cares about each item they produce. It is another American
company that should at least be mentioned in any comparison. Price,
warranties, functionality, and features make for comparisons, not
just the mere suggestion of a popularized name that has a vast
advertising budget, maximized by a brilliant salesman, and used by
many - often because, like sheep, the herd presumes there is only one
manufacturer that makes a machine that comes in a variety of
configurations, with a variety of speeds, torque calibrations, and
features, that are also available from other equally reliable and
dedicated companies that stand behind what they sell, offer similar
features and configurations ( sometimes more than the most well
known) and are available at competitive or more reasonable prices off
the shelf… My point is one must know first what they are looking
for- if it is a single speed pendant motor or a variable speed model,
what they intend to accomplish with a given motor, what HP is
required to do a job to the best possible end, what maintenance is
involved, what accessories are available, what factory maintenance is
required and when…mere statements are not comparisons, but
endorsements… A more effective comparison may be to educate novice
jewelers on the differences in motors, even if by one manufacturer,
and what is required for stone setting rather than woodcarving,
shaping and forming rather than setting, finishing, rather than
shaping, and so on…
If there is one thing lacking in the threads on various products it
is any discussions of alternatives to the brands most heard of… we
are not sheep, or at least i am not part of a herd… and I urge
everyone interested in buying equipment to look past the big boys
catalogues (RG) and discover some quite competitive alternatives,
and then make an informed decision…just because ea jewelry maker one
admires, or aspires to create works as original as theirs, does not
mean that the jewelry maker has all the facts, or even some of the
facts, on any given piece of tooling or equipment - particularly the
basics f the industry like micromotors, powerhones, rolling mills,
pendant motors, lighting, etc… that all are derived from the dental
industries original equipment needs- as jewelry making has changed
little since the middle ages, if not before- with more options
available to consumers, be a good consumer and don’t just accept
that if the herd says acme brand is the best, that it is in fact the
best, or only thing available that will accommodate ones needs at the
bench, and budget considerations as well…
R. E. Rourke