I have spoken to Peter Johns about hardness - he has advised that heat treating standard sterling will achieve approx. 65HV whereas heat treating Argentium will achieve approx. 100HV. By work hardening the Argentium you can achieve between 150-180HV.
Rubbish as my friends in the UK say. Those that are in love with
Arrgentium tend to try to make it into some kind of super alloy that
is better than standard sterling in every regard. It has some
excellent features tarnish resistance, no fire stain) but its
mechanical properties are not better than standard sterling.
From tests and reports done by independent research (Not in the
business of selling or promoting Argentium)
Standard sterling 925 Ag 75 Cu
Annealed : 56HV-66HV
Aged (heat hardened) : 120HV-140HV
Cold Worked : 140HV-180HV
Argentium 935
Annealed : 60HV-70HV
Aged (heat hardened) : 100HV-120HV
Cold Worked : 150HV-160HV
Argentium and standard sterling are very close in performance in
regards to annealed softness and standard sterling is modestly
better than Argentium in age hardening and cold work hardening.
For comparison to a few other metals
18k Yellow (750 Au, 125 Ag, 125 Cu)
Annealed 150HV
Aged 230HV
Cold Worked 212HV
22K Yellow (971 Au, 55 Ag, 28 Cu)
Annealed 52HV
Cold worked 138HV
18K Ni White (750 Au, 3.25 Zn, 14.75 Cu, 7 Ni)
Annealed 208HV
Cold worked 254HV
James Binnion