I am really disturbed about the misrepresentation of the names
of stones! Lately, all sorts of misleading names have been showing
up. At the recent show in Tucson I got some stones that the dealer
assured me were "mustard jade" from a new mine. I got a few, and
when I returned home showed them to a very knowledgeable friend
who assured me that they were not jade, but were probably dyed
quartz.
Unfortunately, jade may be the most widely used misnomer for many
gem materials. It’s all over eBay, rock & gem shows and even jewelry
stores whose owners simply don’t have the knowledge or ability to
identify those materials with regular gemological testing. Even
worse, the number of people who have been selling gems and jewelry
are buying into green “amethyst,” something that is gemologically
impossible is staggering. Referring to this pale, uninteresting
green quartz green “amethyst” is like calling citrine “yellow
‘amethyst.’” Selling this irradiated green quartz as amethyst is
wrong, but two members of my local rock and gem club bought some and
are still referring to it as green “amethyst.”
Whatever happened to truth in advertising??? Does anyone
monitor the dealers in Tucson to assure that what they are selling
is what they are represented to be, or is it caveat emptor???
No, nobody monitors gem dealers anywhere, much less Tucson. At
least, not actively. It takes legal action to rectify a problem if
the dealer who ripped you off won’t give a refund. The gem and
jewelry business is like any other: know what you are buying through
education. Arm yourself with knowledge, and you won’t lose $6k on
that blue dial, two-toned Rolex Submariner copy (they’re quite
convincing unless you know what to look for). Put down your
Presidium Duo-tester and learn how to use a refractometer,
polariscope, SG liquids and loupe, and you will never have to caveat
your gluteus maximus again.
At least in the case of this Africa Blue, there isn’t a serious
misnomer occurring. The owner could as easily call it Asian Azure
and not step on any gemological toes, but it doesn’t represent what
the material actually is, any more than Africa Blue does. It may
well be dumortierite, but even having verified similar materials in
the past as being that mineral, claiming that another mineral is
also dumortierite on the strength of one photo of a bead and two
bead halves on a web page is not a valid method of gem
identification. I’m not suggesting that everyone enroll in several
thousand dollars worth of GIA education. There are many books on the
subject, as well as on-line info.
Like practically all fellow lapidaries I’ve met, my fellow
gemologists are more than willing to help others learn to use
gemological equipment and separate gem materials. They probably
won’t loan theirs out, but will show you how to use yours. And yes,
a good quality refractometer costs upwards of $500 - 600, but a lot
of people will lose more than that the first time they buy
misrepresented goods. I can only imagine how much has been lost on
type C jadeite bangles that break in half the first time they were
worn. Don’t be afraid to ask a local gemologist for help. That is,
help in learning how to use your equipment. Don’t expect them to use
their hard-earned knowledge to ID for you. After all, that
hard-earned knowledge is how we make a living.
And that’s the key phrase - hard-earned knowledge. Don’t expect some
non-existent authority to police the gem world for you. If you’re
not willing to earn the knowledge, don’t be surprised when your
"Transvaal “jade” turns out to be hydrogrossular Garnet.
James in SoFl